The Court / Your Honor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00001077.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) recording an argument against granting bail to the defendant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell). The speaker argues that the defendant has been untruthful about her finances, claiming ignorance of her own wealth ('millions of dollars'), and poses a flight risk involving potential foreign travel documents. The prosecution explicitly compares her situation to the case of Jeffrey Epstein, citing Judge Berman's decision to deny Epstein bail based on flight risk and dangerousness.
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
This document is page 74 of a court transcript from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 10, 2020. A government prosecutor is arguing before the judge that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not protect the defendant (Maxwell) and asserting that the agreement does not bind the current office. The prosecutor further argues against bail, citing the defendant's extensive international ties, unknown finances, and lack of candor regarding resources to flee.
DOJ-OGR-00016971.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, where attorneys Mr. Everdell and Mr. Rohrbach discuss jury instructions with the judge. Key points include a request to substitute a 'Miller charge', a modification to specify a count relates 'solely to Carolyn', and a court clerk's observation about the word 'Minor' in the heading of Count Six. The document captures the procedural process of finalizing legal instructions for a jury.
DOJ-OGR-00013270.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a discussion between the judge (The Court), government counsel (Ms. Moe), and another counsel (Mr. Everdell) about scheduling a charging conference and determining when the defense will rest its case. The parties discuss potential dates, including December 18th, and the possibility of the defense resting on the upcoming Thursday, with the timing contingent on the length of witness cross-examinations.
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text details arguments regarding the 'enticement statute,' utilizing testimony from a victim identified as 'Jane' and an expert, Dr. Rocchio, to establish that the defendant exercised 'coercive control' and personally engaged in sexual abuse. It further argues an 'aiding and abetting' theory, stating the defendant knowingly facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of Jane by being present on the plane and in the room in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00010251.jpg
This document is page 36 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text captures a legal argument regarding the cross-examination of a male witness who is a victim of sexual abuse. The defense (implied) questions the witness about an interview with a reporter named Lucia from The Independent and whether he understood the public consequences of that interview. Prosecutor Ms. Moe objects to the phrasing of the question regarding 'consequences' as confusing, while conceding no objection to limited follow-up on the witness's understanding of public exposure.
DOJ-OGR-00017374.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Visoski (likely a pilot). Visoski testifies about knowing Sarah Kellen since the late 1990s and mentions another woman named Kimberly. The prosecution introduces Government Exhibits 327 and 310, which Visoski identifies as photos showing Sarah Kellen, himself at the front of an aircraft, and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017372.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of a court session where the direct examination of a witness, Lawrence Visoski, is resumed by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning is focused on continuing a discussion from the previous day about Mr. Epstein's office and his employees.
DOJ-OGR-00020318.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter alleges HIPAA violations regarding the release of Maxwell's medical data and details an incident of physical abuse where a guard shoved Maxwell into an isolation cell. The defense requests the Court order the MDC to stop releasing health info and demands video evidence of the abuse incident, which the government disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00011538.jpg
This document is page 19 of a court transcript from a sentencing hearing filed on July 22, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues that the 2003 sentencing guidelines should apply rather than the 2004 guidelines to avoid violating the Ex Post Facto Clause, noting that the Probation Department recommended a downward variance to 240 months despite a calculated range of 292-365 months.
Purpose of Jane's travel from New Mexico
An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for the purpose of illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present. The speaker contrasts this with Jane's testimony that her trip to New Mexico was for that purpose.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity