This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The testimony concerns a communal message pad kept on a kitchen desk. Following the testimony, an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, objects to the admission of certain messages as evidence, arguing they are hearsay while conceding that messages in Mr. Alessi's or his wife's handwriting have been authenticated.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alessi | Witness |
Subject of a direct examination, mentioned as having identified his and his wife's handwriting on messages.
|
| Pagliuca | Mr. |
An attorney speaking in court, making objections on behalf of a client.
|
| Alessi's wife |
Mentioned in reference to her handwriting on messages.
|
|
| Comey | Ms. |
Mentioned by the Court, likely another attorney involved in the proceedings.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by Mr. Pagliuca; presiding over the court proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The entity presiding over the legal proceedings, represented by the judge.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"Your Honor, I have no objection to the messages that were identified by Mr. Alessi as to his handwriting or his wife's handwriting. I think those have been authenticated. I object to the remainder as being hearsay."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,256 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document