DOJ-OGR-00009057.jpg
556 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
556 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, details requests for evidence related to potential misconduct by "Juror No. 50." It seeks communications, social media activity, and records of payments to the juror. The document also describes how this juror and another juror, who both allegedly failed to disclose they were victims of childhood sexual abuse, discussed these experiences during deliberations, potentially influencing the verdict rendered by all 12 jurors.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
The central figure in a misconduct investigation, whose communications, social media activity, and potential payments...
|
| one other juror | Juror |
A juror who, like Juror No. 50, allegedly did not disclose being a victim of sexual abuse as a child, and whose exper...
|
| all 12 jurors | Jurors |
The group of jurors who rendered a verdict and are potentially implicated by the identified misconduct.
|
| (presumably) ten jurors | Jurors |
The jurors who are believed to have responded truthfully to a questionnaire.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| company |
Listed as a social media platform from which records concerning Juror No. 50 are to be produced.
|
|
| company |
Listed as a social media platform from which records concerning Juror No. 50 are to be produced.
|
|
| company |
Listed as a social media platform from which records concerning Juror No. 50 are to be produced.
|
|
| company |
Listed as a social media platform from which records concerning Juror No. 50 are to be produced.
|
|
| New York Times | media organization |
Cited as a source, along with Juror No. 50, for the information that another juror did not disclose being a victim of...
|
Timeline (2 events)
A discussion occurred among jurors where one juror's undisclosed experience as a victim of sexual abuse was brought up, apparently in support of Juror No. 50's position.
All 12 jurors rendered a verdict in the case.
Relationships (2)
Both jurors allegedly did not disclose being victims of sexual abuse as children. The other juror's experience was discussed in support of Juror No. 50's position during deliberations.
Juror No. 50 spoke to the other jurors and disclosed personal information, influencing deliberations.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,413 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 56 of 66
c. Non-privileged emails or other written communications between Juror No. 50 and any other person, including any news or media organization about Juror No. 50’s service as a juror in this case;
d. Any record of payments to Juror No. 50 in exchange for any interview or information about his service as a juror in this case;
2. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, or other social media networking platforms identified by the parties, to produce:
a. All communications to and from Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case;
b. All posts, comments, or photographs posted by Juror No. 50 regarding his service as a juror in this case.
c. All documents reflecting dates on which Juror No. 50 opened or closed his accounts.
B. The hearing itself
The misconduct identified potentially implicates all 12 jurors who rendered a verdict here. According to Juror No. 50 and the New York Times, one other juror did not disclose that he or she was the victim of sexual abuse as a child. Nevertheless, that juror’s experiences were discussed apparently in support of Juror No. 50’s position. What these two jurors disclosed to the (presumably) ten jurors who responded to the questionnaire truthfully will be relevant to determine the identity of the second juror and what Juror No. 50 said to the other jurors.
49
DOJ-OGR-00009057
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document