HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732.jpg

1.72 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: News article / web printout snippet
File Size: 1.72 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a news article or political report (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732) discussing the confirmation process of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense. It details political pressure from pro-Israel groups and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) for Hagel to toughen his stance on Iran. The text notes that Hagel quickly 'backtracked' or clarified his views to align with the administration's tougher line to satisfy Democratic senators.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Chuck Hagel Nominee for Secretary of Defense / Former Senator
Subject of the article; facing criticism for past views on Iran and meeting with senators to clarify his stance.
Barack Obama President of the United States
Warned by Congress members to rein Hagel in.
Robert Satloff Executive Director (listed as 'direction')
Of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP); warned the White House regarding Hagel's stance.
Israel-friendly members of Congress Congress Members
Warned Obama regarding Hagel.
Democratic senators Senators
Met with Hagel and announced satisfaction with his clarified views.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Pro-Israel think tank lead by Robert Satloff.
Congress
Legislative body involved in confirmation.
White House
Executive branch administration.
Pentagon
Department of Defense headquarters.

Timeline (2 events)

Early 2013 (Implied)
Nomination of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense
Washington D.C.
Early 2013 (Implied)
Meetings between Hagel and Senators regarding confirmation
Washington D.C.
Chuck Hagel Democratic Senators

Locations (4)

Location Context
Subject of foreign policy debate.
Capital of Iran, used metonymically for the Iranian government.
Ally mentioned in context of military action and policy.
Home state of former Senator Hagel.

Relationships (2)

Chuck Hagel Political (Nominee/Nominator) Barack Obama
nomination as secretary of defense
Robert Satloff Political Critic Chuck Hagel
Satloff warned bluntly that the White House should act quickly to make sure that Hagel backs away from his previous views

Key Quotes (2)

"If the White House does not take steps soon to correct that impression, the chances for a negotiated resolution of the Iran nuclear crisis will fall nearly to zero and the likelihood of Israeli military action will rise dramatically"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732.jpg
Quote #1
"military option ought to be 'on the table.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,345 characters)

slammed Hagel for his past comments and positions on Iran. In conjunction with Israel-friendly members of Congress, they’ve warned Obama to rein Hagel in so as not to send a dovish signal to Tehran. Robert Satloff, executive direction of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), a pro-Israel think tank, warned bluntly that the White House should act quickly to make sure that Hagel backs away from his previous views on Iran and at least toes the administration’s tougher line. “If the White House does not take steps soon to correct that impression, the chances for a negotiated resolution of the Iran nuclear crisis will fall nearly to zero and the likelihood of Israeli military action will rise dramatically,” he wrote.
Indeed, within days of his nomination as secretary of defense, Hagel was already backing away from his earlier views, meeting with senior Pentagon officials and influential senators who’ll vote on his confirmation to clarify his views on Iran, asserting that he supports broad international sanctions against Iran and that he believes that the military option ought to be “on the table.” Several Democratic senators who met with Hagel announced with satisfaction that the former senator from Nebraska had sufficiently backtracked or “clarified” his views on Iran. Consequently, they
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document