| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Robert Satloff
|
Political critic |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political appointee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political appointment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Advisor president |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Advisor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Nomination |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Speaker
|
Diplomatic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political nominee nominator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Barack Obama
|
Political nominator nominee |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Nomination of Hagel for Secretary of Defense | Washington | View |
| N/A | N/A | Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearing | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Nomination of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meetings between Hagel and Senators regarding confirmation | Washington D.C. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Nomination of Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense. | Washington | View |
| 2013-02-01 | N/A | Senate Armed Services Committee hearing regarding Chuck Hagel's nomination. | Washington D.C. (implied) | View |
| 2013-02-01 | N/A | Chuck Hagel confirmation hearings | Washington D.C. | View |
| 2013-01-31 | N/A | Confirmation hearings for Chuck Hagel | Washington D.C. (Implied) | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Formation/Installation of Obama's new national security team | Washington | View |
| 2013-01-01 | N/A | Hagel meetings with Pentagon officials and Senators | Washington D.C. | View |
This document appears to be page 2 of a speech draft or talking points bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The text, likely spoken by an Israeli official or representative, congratulates Chuck Hagel on becoming Secretary of Defense and addresses a group of young activists, praising their commitment to the US-Israel relationship.
This document appears to be a page from a political article or briefing paper analyzing U.S.-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations, sanctions, and the political stalemate between the Obama administration and Congress (circa 2013). It references the Council on Foreign Relations and Chuck Hagel's confirmation hearings. While stamped with a House Oversight mark typical of the Epstein document dumps, the specific text on this page concerns geopolitical strategy and contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document appears to be a page from a media monitoring report or briefing book, stamped with a House Oversight footer. It contains the conclusion of one opinion piece and the beginning of another titled 'Let's face it: Obama's Iran policy is failing' by James Traub, dated February 8, 2013. The text focuses on US foreign policy regarding Iran, discussing sanctions, the nomination of Chuck Hagel, and diplomatic interactions involving Joe Biden and Benjamin Netanyahu.
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis or article regarding US-Iran-Israel relations in early 2013, shortly after Obama's second inauguration. It discusses the political obstacles Obama faces in making a deal with Iran, specifically citing the influence of 'pro-Israeli forces' such as AIPAC and Sheldon Adelson. It notes Obama's upcoming visit to Israel in March 2013.
This document appears to be a page from a news article or blog post included in House Oversight materials. It discusses the confirmation of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense and the Obama administration's foreign policy strategy regarding Iran, specifically ruling out force in favor of potential bilateral negotiations. It highlights remarks made by Vice President Joe Biden at the Munich Security Conference and the positive response from Iran's Foreign Minister.
This document page, marked with a House Oversight Bates number, appears to be an excerpt from a political article discussing the nomination of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense. It details pressure from pro-Israel members of Congress and WINEP director Robert Satloff for Hagel to adopt a tougher stance on Iran. The text notes that Hagel subsequently met with officials and Senators to clarify his support for sanctions and keeping military options open.
This document appears to be a page from a political article or report discussing U.S. sanctions against Iran during the Obama administration. It details the signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the economic impact on Iran (targeting shipping, aluminum, oil, gold), and speculates that the nomination of Hagel for Secretary of Defense signals a shift in White House strategy away from purely coercive measures. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation document dump.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical briefing or analysis paper produced for the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029817). It discusses the diplomatic climate regarding Iran's nuclear program around early 2013, referencing President Obama's new security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and the potential for a 'shop, ship, and shut' deal structure involving the P5+1. The text speculates on the existence of secret back-channel talks similar to those that occurred in Vienna in 2009.
This document appears to be a page from a larger compilation of news articles or press briefings, marked with a House Oversight footer. It contains snippets of two articles: one discussing the confirmation difficulties of Chuck Hagel as Defense Secretary and President Obama's upcoming trip to Israel, and a second 'Foreign Policy' article dated February 5, 2013, featuring an interview with Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat.
This document appears to be a page from a news article or political analysis piece included in a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029734). It discusses the confirmation hearings of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense and predicts his influence on President Obama regarding Iran policy, specifically suggesting a move away from military strikes. It also details diplomatic overtures made by Vice President Joe Biden at the Munich Security Conference offering bilateral talks with Iran, and the favorable response from Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi.
This document appears to be a page from a report or article contained within House Oversight files. It details the confirmation hearings of Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense on January 31 (2013), specifically focusing on his shift in stance regarding Iran sanctions and military intervention. It includes commentary from WINEP official Dennis Ross, who expressed to the LA Times that 2013 would be a decisive year for Iranian diplomacy and potential force.
This document appears to be a page from a news article or political report (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029732) discussing the confirmation process of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense. It details political pressure from pro-Israel groups and the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) for Hagel to toughen his stance on Iran. The text notes that Hagel quickly 'backtracked' or clarified his views to align with the administration's tougher line to satisfy Democratic senators.
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis article or report found within a House Oversight document dump. The text discusses U.S. sanctions against Iran, the signing of the NDAA by President Obama, and the geopolitical implications of nominating Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense. It analyzes the efficacy of economic sanctions versus diplomatic approaches with Iran.
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical analysis or article discussing United States-Iran relations, specifically focusing on nuclear negotiations. It outlines the composition of President Obama's second-term national security team (Kerry, Hagel, Brennan) and discusses potential strategies for a preliminary deal involving sanctions relief in exchange for limits on enrichment. The text also references historical back-channel talks in 2009 and speculates on current secret diplomacy.
Clarification of policy stances.
Clarification of policy stances.
Hagel commits to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and keeping all options on the table.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity