DOJ-OGR-00001964.jpg
650 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
650 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on December 10, 2020, argues against granting bail to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The prosecution or court contends that her significant financial resources, demonstrated sophistication in hiding herself and her assets following the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein, and her extraordinary capacity to evade detection make her a flight risk. The document concludes that even a bail package with electronic monitoring would be insufficient to ensure her appearance in court.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the document, which argues for her detention due to her financial resources, sophistication in hiding,...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned as the person whose arrest prompted Ms. Maxwell to retreat from view.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The arrest of Jeffrey Epstein.
After Jeffrey Epstein's arrest, Ms. Maxwell retreated from view, moved to New England, and changed locations on multiple occasions.
New England
A court hearing or filing regarding Ms. Maxwell's bail conditions and potential for detention.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Ms. Maxwell moved to New England after the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein.
|
Relationships (1)
The document states that Ms. Maxwell's actions of retreating from view and hiding were a direct result of "the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein."
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,582 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 87 of 91
k7e2MaxC kjc
k7e2MaxC kjc
the resources available to her, it is practically impossible to
set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her
appearance in court.
Even if the picture of her financial resources were
not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.
Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial
resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those
resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,
Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,
changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have
made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense
said that she did all of this not to hide from the government
but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press
scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide
from the press and public, an assumption that the court does
not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent
conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade
detection, even in the face of what the defense has
acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.
Because of these concerns, even a bail package with
electronic monitoring and home security guards would be
insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply
remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have
observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not
prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head
set financial bail conditions that could reasonably assure her
appearance in court.
Even if the picture of her financial resources were
not opaque, as it is, detention would still be appropriate.
Personally, the defendant not only has significant financial
resources, but has demonstrated sophistication in hiding those
resources and herself. After the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein,
Ms. Maxwell retreated from view. She moved to New England,
changing locations on multiple occasions, and appears to have
made anonymous transactions both big and small. The defense
said that she did all of this not to hide from the government
but to maintain her privacy and avoid public and press
scrutiny. Even assuming that Ms. Maxwell only wanted to hide
from the press and public, an assumption that the court does
not share, but even assuming that's the case, her recent
conduct underscores her extraordinary capacity to evade
detection, even in the face of what the defense has
acknowledged to be extreme and unusual efforts to locate her.
Because of these concerns, even a bail package with
electronic monitoring and home security guards would be
insufficient. Were she to flee, the defendant could simply
remove the monitoring bracelet and, as other courts have
observed, home detention with electronic monitoring does not
prevent flight. At best it limits a fleeing defendant's head
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001964
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document