Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (notice of motion)
File Size: 123 KB
Summary

This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 6, 2023, by attorneys for James E. Staley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It requests the dismissal of an amended stockholder derivative complaint involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. The filing outlines the legal basis (Rules 12(b)(6) and 23.1(b)) and sets the schedule for subsequent responses and replies.

People (5)

Name Role Context
James E. Staley Defendant
Former executive filing a motion to dismiss a stockholder derivative complaint.
John McNichols Attorney
Counsel for James Edward Staley, Williams & Connolly LLP.
Brendan V. Sullivan Jr. Attorney
Counsel for James Edward Staley, Williams & Connolly LLP.
Zachary K. Warren Attorney
Counsel for James Edward Staley, Williams & Connolly LLP.
Stephen L. Wohlgemuth Attorney
Counsel for James Edward Staley, Williams & Connolly LLP.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Court where the case is filed.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Nominal Defendant in the derivative litigation.
Williams & Connolly LLP
Law firm representing Defendant James E. Staley.

Timeline (3 events)

2023-07-06
Filing of Defendant James E. Staley's Notice of Motion to Dismiss.
Southern District of New York
2023-07-20
Deadline for Plaintiffs' response to the motion.
Southern District of New York
Plaintiffs
2023-07-29
Deadline for Defendants' reply briefs.
Southern District of New York
Defendants

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court.
Location of Williams & Connolly LLP (680 Maine Avenue SW).

Relationships (2)

James E. Staley Attorney-Client John McNichols
John McNichols listed as Counsel for Defendant James Edward Staley
Staley is a defendant in derivative litigation involving JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Key Quotes (1)

"Defendant James E. Staley hereby respectfully requests that the Court dismiss all claims in the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs on behalf of Nominal Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co."
Source
028.pdf
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,284 characters)

Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR Document 28 Filed 07/06/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Master Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR
DERIVATIVE ACTION
DEFENDANT JAMES E. STALEY’S NOTICE OF MOTION TO
DISMISS THE AMENDED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 23.1(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant
James E. Staley hereby respectfully requests that the Court dismiss all claims in the Complaint
filed by Plaintiffs on behalf of Nominal Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. The reasons supporting
Mr. Staley’s motion are set forth in the corresponding Memorandum of Law.
In accordance with the Court’s Case Management Plan, ECF No. 16, this response to
Plaintiffs’ Complaint is filed by July 6, 2023. Per the same order, Plaintiffs’ response to this
motion is due by July 20, 2023; and Defendants’ reply briefs, if any, are due by July 29, 2023.
Date: July 6, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ John McNichols
Brendan V. Sullivan Jr.
John McNichols
Zachary K. Warren
Stephen L. Wohlgemuth
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
680 Maine Avenue SW
Washington, DC 20024
Tel: (202) 434-5252
Fax: (202) 434-5029
jmcnichols@wc.com
Counsel for Defendant James Edward Staley

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document