AMS
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
John McNichols
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Modi
|
Membership |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | Training | The Department’s Office of Legal Programs provided a training entitled Crime Victims’ Rights in t... | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting to discuss 'op plans' (operational plans). | Unknown | View |
040.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York dated November 7, 2023, granting attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP admission *pro hac vice* to represent defendant James Edward Staley. The case involves the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and several individual defendants, including James Dimon and James Staley.
028.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 6, 2023, by attorneys for James E. Staley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It requests the dismissal of an amended stockholder derivative complaint involving JPMorgan Chase & Co. The filing outlines the legal basis (Rules 12(b)(6) and 23.1(b)) and sets the schedule for subsequent responses and replies.
019.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 30, 2023, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP seeks permission to represent defendant James Edward Staley in the case 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon et al.', which names numerous JPMorgan Chase executives and board members as defendants.
019-05.pdf
A proposed court order filed on June 30, 2023, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney John McNichols of Williams & Connolly LLP admission *pro hac vice* to represent defendant James Edward Staley. The underlying case involves a lawsuit by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase executives, including Jamie Dimon and Mary Erdoes.
019-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on June 30, 2023, by John McNichols, a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, supporting his motion to appear pro hac vice in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. The case involves JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and lists numerous individual defendants including James Dimon and James E. Staley. McNichols attests to his good standing with the bars of Maryland, Virginia, and D.C., and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
EFTA00038498.pdf
This document consists of handwritten notes describing a property manager and an FBI Receipt for Property (FD-597) dated July 11, 2019. The receipt documents the FBI taking possession of two suitcases: a locked blue Zero Halliburton hard cover suitcase and a black Samsonite soft canvas suitcase. The notes mention someone being 'tasked on Sunday to get items for sale' and having 'possession of safe materials'.
EFTA00037015.pdf
This document is a Confidential Literary Option/Purchase Agreement between Braven Films LLC and an unnamed Author for the rights to the book 'Silenced No More'. The agreement sets an option price of $7,000 for 18 months, with potential purchase prices ranging from $80,000 to $300,000 for a film, or $10,000 per episode for a series. Notably, the contract stipulates that Steve Ross must be invited to any premiere screening alongside the Author.
EFTA00032918.pdf
This document is a 'Year in Review' email newsletter from Law360 dated December 26, 2019, summarizing major trends, mergers, and judicial confirmations in the legal industry. It includes extensive lists of law firms, companies, and government agencies mentioned in their reporting. The document appears in this collection likely due to the inclusion of the law firm 'Epstein Becker Green' in the list of law firms, which is a keyword match for 'Epstein' but unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein personally.
EFTA00032906.pdf
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
EFTA00030281.pdf
This document is a Law360 New York email newsletter dated July 15, 2019. The top stories focus on Jeffrey Epstein's legal battles, specifically highlighting that potential child pornography found in his home could derail his bail bid, and federal allegations that he paid $350,000 to influence witnesses. The newsletter also covers various other legal developments involving SunEdison, L'Oreal, Donald Trump's financial subpoenas, and various corporate lawsuits.
EFTA00029619.pdf
This document is an internal DOJ email chain from July 2, 2021, discussing the imminent release of Epstein-related materials to the New York Times via FOIA. The correspondence involves the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office, Main Justice, and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) coordinating media strategy and agreeing that SDNY will handle press inquiries. There is specific mention of interest from the Attorney General's Office regarding the release.
EFTA00029454.pdf
An internal Department of Justice email chain from July 2021 discussing an upcoming 'voluminous' FOIA release related to Epstein. The emails coordinate press handling between the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office and Main Justice, noting specific interest from the Attorney General's Office.
EFTA00010574.pdf
This document contains an email thread from June 27, 2019, discussing the coordination of a meeting involving 'Epstein teams' to discuss 'op plans' (operational plans). The participants' identities are redacted, but they appear to be coordinating strategy or logistics. One participant mentions waiting for a call back from a redacted individual.
EFTA00002163.pdf
This document is a photograph of a black Samsonite suitcase with an American Airlines luggage tag attached. The tag identifies the passenger as 'TRESTIZA/MYLA LACS' traveling on flight AA 943 to St. Thomas (STT), Virgin Islands, on June 6th. The item is marked with evidence number EFTA00002163.
DOJ-OGR-00021446.jpg
This legal document details the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein case concerning victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Following Epstein's death, a district court denied the victims' (petitioners') motion for remedies, such as rescinding the non-prosecution agreement, deeming the issue moot. The document also covers an appeal by a victim named Wild and the government's legal arguments that its CVRA obligations were not triggered because charges were never filed in the original district.
DOJ-OGR-00016914.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell presents stipulations agreed upon by both parties, including the birth date of Mike Wallace and the opening dates of *The Lion King* on Broadway. The page concludes with the beginning of a written stipulation regarding a witness named 'Kate' attending a meeting with prosecutors in September, listing the full legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031577.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a news article (likely from The Economist given the style) discussing the political victory of Narendra Modi and the BJP in India. It analyzes the economic motivations of the voters, Modi's background with the RSS, and upcoming political moves scheduled for May 20th. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a larger congressional investigation file.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031516.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2016. Stan Pottinger emailed Reid Weingarten a link to a Guardian article about a lawsuit involving Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting they catch up soon. The next day, Weingarten forwarded this email with 'High' importance to Jeffrey Epstein at his 'jeevacation@gmail.com' address.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022078.jpg
This document is an excerpt (pages 108-109) from the book 'Filthy Rich' presented as evidence (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022078). It details Jeffrey Epstein's financial strategies in the 1980s, specifically highlighting an oil-drilling deal in 1982 where investor Michael Stroll put in $450,000. When Stroll demanded his money back in 1984, Epstein only returned $10,000 (claiming in court it was for a horse), leading to a federal lawsuit that was eventually settled out of court with secret terms.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012090.jpg
This document is page 12 of a 'Global Foresight' report from the third quarter of 2017, marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It provides a financial and geopolitical analysis of South Korea, focusing on the market performance and political shifts following the impeachment of President Park Geun-Hye and the election of President Moon Jae-In. The text details Moon's corporate reforms regarding 'chaebols,' his appointments of reformist officials, and his efforts to repair diplomatic relations with China (regarding THAAD) and North Korea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017778.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a portion of a Vanity Fair article describing Jeffrey Epstein's early financial dealings and legal troubles. It details a lawsuit by Michael Stroll regarding a $450,000 investment, Epstein's close mentorship under Steven Hoffenberg (including a $25k/month salary and shared travel), and conflicting narratives surrounding Epstein's sudden resignation from Bear Stearns in 1981 amidst an S.E.C. insider trading investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017558.jpg
This document is a biography page for director Julie Taymor, featuring a photograph and a summary of her career achievements in theater, film, and opera. It details her awards (Tony, Emmy, etc.) and major works including 'The Lion King', 'Frida', and 'The Tempest'. The document contains a House Oversight footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017558), indicating it is part of a larger collection of documents reviewed during congressional investigations, likely a page from a conference program or briefing packet found within the Epstein case files.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018006.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a Vanity Fair article from March 2003. It details Jeffrey Epstein's early financial dealings, including a lawsuit by Michael Stroll over a failed oil investment and his close relationship with Steven Hoffenberg, who hired him as a consultant and provided him with office space. The text also investigates the circumstances of Epstein's 1981 departure from Bear Stearns, contrasting official claims of voluntary resignation with rumors of 'illegal operations' and S.E.C. investigations into insider trading.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013314.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing titled 'Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment.' It argues that Epstein's voluntary dismissal of previous claims against Edwards constitutes a 'bona fide termination' of proceedings, supporting Edwards' counterclaim for malicious prosecution. The text asserts that Epstein dismissed his claims on the eve of a hearing because he knew he lacked probable cause and verifiable evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024581.jpg
This document creates a management profile for a company called KUE, likely part of a larger offering memorandum or business proposal. It details the biographies of the three principals: Michael Milken (Chairman), Steven Green (Vice Chairman), and Lowell Milken (CEO), highlighting their philanthropic work, past business leadership (Samsonite, Heron International), and government service (Green's ambassadorship). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity