This document is a transcript of a legal summation delivered by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. She argues that the accusers' memories may be unreliable by explaining psychological concepts such as autosuggestion and memory contamination. Menninger suggests that factors like discussions with lawyers, media, other accusers, and the prospect of financial recovery from lawsuits or a victims' compensation fund could have distorted their recollections.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Accusers | Victims/Plaintiffs |
Mentioned as individuals whose memories are being discussed, who talked to lawyers, media, and other accusers.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| victims' compensation fund | Fund |
Mentioned as a means through which accusers planned to recover money.
|
| news media | Industry |
Mentioned as a source of post-event information that can influence memories.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed in the footer, likely the court reporting agency that produced the transcript.
|
"And post-event information can impact a memory at any one of those stages."Source
"The older a memory gets, the more susceptible it is to post-event information."Source
"Basically, when people suggest things to themselves, and then they start to remember things and they start to draw inferences, and then they start to feel as if those things are actual memories."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,604 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document