DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
427 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
427 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022. It captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness named Brune, who is being questioned about her assessment of potentially significant information regarding a juror and whether it should have been raised with a Judge Pauley. The transcript includes legal objections and rulings, indicating a contentious line of questioning.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The person being questioned on direct examination.
|
| MR. GAIR | Attorney |
Makes an objection during the questioning of Brune.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge who overrules an objection.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned in the questioning regarding the significance of information to him.
|
| Ms. Brune | Witness |
Referenced by the questioner.
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
Addresses the judge regarding the interruption of the witness's answer.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-02-24
Direct examination of witness Brune regarding her understanding of 'significant information' concerning a potential juror and whether it should have been brought to Judge Pauley's attention. The testimony includes objections and interventions by attorneys.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court, mentioned in the name of the reporting company.
|
Relationships (3)
The questioner is conducting a direct examination of the witness, Brune.
Mr. Gair makes an objection to the Court, which the Court overrules.
Mr. Schectman intervenes on behalf of the witness, Brune, to prevent her from being interrupted mid-answer.
Key Quotes (4)
"Objection, asked and answered, your Honor."Source
— MR. GAIR
(An attorney objecting to a question posed to the witness, Brune.)
DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
Quote #1
"If it was the same person it was significant information, that's correct."Source
— Brune
(The witness's answer (A.) confirming her understanding of the significance of certain information.)
DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
Quote #2
"I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to Judge Pauley if it was the same person."Source
— Brune
(The witness's answer (A.) regarding the potential significance of information to Judge Pauley.)
DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
Quote #3
"Judge, I'm okay with some stopping, but really not in the middle of answers."Source
— MR. SCHECTMAN
(An attorney addressing the judge to object to the questioner interrupting the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00009326.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 37 of 130
A-5722
A-5722
C2GFDAU1
Brune - direct
265
1 Q. And you didn't -- that is actually not answering the
2 question I asked.
3 A. I'm sorry. Do it again and I'll try to get it.
4 Q. You understood this was significant information
5 potentially, yes?
6 MR. GAIR: Objection, asked and answered, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Overruled.
8 A. If it was the same person it was significant information,
9 that's correct.
10 Q. And you didn't need anyone to explain to you that it was
11 potentially significant information?
12 A. No.
13 Q. And that it would be significant to Judge Pauley, correct?
14 A. I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to
15 Judge Pauley if it was the same person.
16 Q. And one way you find out if it's the same person is to ask
17 Judge Pauley to ask the potential juror, correct?
18 A. No. If the person has sworn under oath that her highest
19 level of education is college and has disclaimed any contact
20 with any disciplinary authority, I don't think that was the
21 reasonable course at all. What happened --
22 Q. Let me stop you there, Ms. Brune. Are you saying --
23 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I'm okay with some stopping,
24 but really not in the middle of answers.
25 THE COURT: Right. Did you complete your answer,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Brune - direct
265
1 Q. And you didn't -- that is actually not answering the
2 question I asked.
3 A. I'm sorry. Do it again and I'll try to get it.
4 Q. You understood this was significant information
5 potentially, yes?
6 MR. GAIR: Objection, asked and answered, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Overruled.
8 A. If it was the same person it was significant information,
9 that's correct.
10 Q. And you didn't need anyone to explain to you that it was
11 potentially significant information?
12 A. No.
13 Q. And that it would be significant to Judge Pauley, correct?
14 A. I believe that it was certainly going to be significant to
15 Judge Pauley if it was the same person.
16 Q. And one way you find out if it's the same person is to ask
17 Judge Pauley to ask the potential juror, correct?
18 A. No. If the person has sworn under oath that her highest
19 level of education is college and has disclaimed any contact
20 with any disciplinary authority, I don't think that was the
21 reasonable course at all. What happened --
22 Q. Let me stop you there, Ms. Brune. Are you saying --
23 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I'm okay with some stopping,
24 but really not in the middle of answers.
25 THE COURT: Right. Did you complete your answer,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009326
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document