DOJ-OGR-00020603.jpg
672 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
672 KB
Summary
This document is a legal affirmation filed on January 12, 2023, by John M. Leventhal, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. He is requesting an extension of time to file an appellate brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The reasons provided for the delay are the law firm's heavy workload due to another complex case and a serious health condition affecting one of the appellate attorneys on the team.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Defendant-Appellant |
The client on whose behalf the motion to extend time is being filed.
|
| JOHN M. LEVENTHAL | Attorney |
The attorney from AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C. who is submitting the affirmation in support of the motion.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT | Government agency |
The court where the appeal (Case 22-1426) is being heard.
|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | Government |
The Appellee in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C. | Company |
The law firm representing the Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| New York Court of Appeals | Government agency |
A court that granted the law firm leave on another matter, consuming their time and resources.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-07-15
John M. Leventhal filed a Notice of Appearance in the case.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT
John M. Leventhal
2022-07-28
John M. Leventhal filed a scheduling request for the Appellant's brief to be due on January 30, 2023.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT
John M. Leventhal
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction where attorney John M. Leventhal is admitted to practice law.
|
Relationships (1)
John M. Leventhal is an attorney at the law firm AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C., which represents Ghislaine Maxwell, the Defendant-Appellant in this case.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,873 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 40, 01/12/2023, 3451920, Page2 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND CIRCUIT
----------------------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SECOND CIRCUIT
----------------------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
- against -
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
----------------------------------------------------X
----------------------------------------------------X
Docket No.: 22-1426
AFFIRMATION IN
SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-
APPELLANT’S
MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE BRIEF
SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-
APPELLANT’S
MOTION TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE BRIEF
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York and a partner of the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C., attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, hereby affirms the following statements, under penalties of perjury:
1. That I am a partner at the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C., attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell (hereinafter “Appellant”), and as such, am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action.
3. On July 15, 2022, I filed a Notice of Appearance in this matter so that trial counsel could withdraw.
4. On July 28, 2022, I filed a scheduling request asking that Appellant’s brief be due on January 30, 2023, based on the size of the record.
5. Soon after this Court granted our scheduling request, we were notified that the New York Court of Appeals had granted us leave on another matter which also involved a voluminous record and several issues of law which required substantial time and resources.
6. The work of our small team of experienced appellate attorneys has been divided between these two cases. In addition, one of our appellate attorneys is dealing with a serious health condition. This has impacted his ability to work on the case.
7. Another factor that has affected our ability to complete this brief by the current
1
DOJ-OGR-00020603
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document