This document is page 297 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Ms. Brune by attorney Mr. Davis. The questioning focuses on a previous statement made by Ms. Trzaskoma regarding a 'suspension opinion' and a 'Westlaw report' that came to light before voir dire. Mr. Davis is pressing the witness to confirm that a Westlaw report was attached to a letter submitted to the court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | Witness |
Under direct examination, testifying about the submission of a letter and awareness of facts.
|
| Mr. Davis | Attorney |
Conducting the examination of Ms. Brune.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, granting Mr. Davis time.
|
| Mr. Wooten | Court Staff/Technician |
Asked by Mr. Davis to display Government Exhibit 9.
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma | Person mentioned |
Quoted in the transcript regarding a statement made to the Court about submitting a letter.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Westlaw |
Referenced in relation to a 'Westlaw report'.
|
|
| Government |
Referenced via 'Government Exhibit 9'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter's name.
|
"What she did was what the judge had sort of given people the option of saying that they would do, which is that she said that she would submit a letter, and then we worked very hard to submit a letter that was accurate."Source
"Your Honor, we were not aware of the facts that have come to light, and I think if your Honor deems it appropriate, we can submit a letter"Source
"One of the facts that had come to light was the very same suspension opinion that she had found before voir dire ever started, correct?"Source
"The question is, one of the facts that came to light that you attached was the Westlaw report, correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,378 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document