EFTA00021917.pdf
52.8 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
52.8 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from July 22, 2020, among a legal team discussing the urgent filing of a letter to Judge Netburn (and potentially Judge Nathan) regarding an order on unsealing and Local Rule 23.1. The team is experiencing technical difficulties, including VPN issues and Westlaw being down. Two attachments are referenced: one addressed to Judge Nathan regarding Rule 23.1 and another to Netburn regarding an unsealing order.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Netburn | Judge/Magistrate |
Subject of the email 'draft letter to Netburn' and attachment filename, likely Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned in attachment filename 'letter_to_Judge_Nathan', likely Judge Alison Nathan
|
| GM | Unknown |
Initials in attachment filename
|
| JE | Subject of Litigation |
Initials in attachment filename, likely referring to Jeffrey Epstein in the context of the case file name
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw |
Legal research service mentioned as being down
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-07-22
Legal team coordinating to file a letter to Judge Netburn regarding an order on unsealing and Local Rule 23.1.
N/A
[Redacted Legal Team]
Key Quotes (4)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,787 characters)
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
[REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:12:05 +0000
Attachments: 2020-07-22,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1.docx
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
[REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:12:05 +0000
Attachments: 2020-07-22,_GM_letter_to_Judge_Nathan_re_Local_Rule_23.1.docx
Sorry guys, I'm having bad tech issues today. Attached is the draft letter re 23.1, which is far rougher than I'd hoped to get it. I should free back up in an hour or so, at which point I can turn back to this if there's still more to do on it.
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:57 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:57 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
Looking at this now.
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:55 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:55 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: draft letter to Netburn
No problem, totally understand.
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 13:55
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: draft letter to Netburn
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 13:55
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: draft letter to Netburn
Sorry guys I can't. I keep getting kicked off the vpn, and I'm fighting with my computer, so I haven't been able to do nearly as much work as I had planned this afternoon.
On Jul 22, 2020, at 1:52 PM, [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> wrote:
So I obviously had to do this pretty quickly today, and it doesn't help that Westlaw has been down all afternoon, but one way or the other we gotta get something filed. Does either of you have a moment to take a look at this in the next hour or so? [REDACTED] I'm sorry, I know you have something at 2:00! If the answer is no, totally understand, I can just pass it up to [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]. Thanks either way and talk soon.
<2020-07-22, JE, letter to Netburn re order on unsealing.docx>
<2020-07-22, JE, letter to Netburn re order on unsealing.docx>
EFTA00021917
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document