Magistrate Judge Netburn
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00031359.pdf
An email chain from July 22, 2020, between a legal team discussing a draft letter to Judge Netburn regarding an 'order on unsealing' in a case related to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The team discusses technical difficulties with their VPN and Westlaw being down while trying to meet a filing deadline.
EFTA00021917.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 22, 2020, among a legal team discussing the urgent filing of a letter to Judge Netburn (and potentially Judge Nathan) regarding an order on unsealing and Local Rule 23.1. The team is experiencing technical difficulties, including VPN issues and Westlaw being down. Two attachments are referenced: one addressed to Judge Nathan regarding Rule 23.1 and another to Netburn regarding an unsealing order.
EFTA00021916.pdf
An email dated July 22, 2020, between members of a legal team discussing a draft letter to Judge Netburn regarding an order on unsealing documents (referenced in the attachment as 'JE', likely Jeffrey Epstein/Ghislaine Maxwell case related). The sender notes urgency and technical difficulties with Westlaw.
EFTA00021875.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002937.jpg
This document is a Table of Contents (page ii) for a legal filing by the Department of Justice in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. It outlines arguments against the defendant's motions to suppress evidence, asserting that Fourth and Fifth Amendment claims fail and that the government acted in good faith. The document also outlines a section arguing that a jury should decide whether Maxwell committed perjury, specifically referencing depositions from April and July 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00004788.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 25, 2021, describes a court proceeding from April 9, 2019, where Judge McMahon granted the Government's application to modify a protective order. The judge found extraordinary circumstances allowed the modification, enabling the Government to obtain information for its investigation into high-profile targets, including Maxwell, without tipping them off. Consequently, the law firm BSF turned over records from a civil litigation, including transcripts of Maxwell's depositions, to the Government.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity