This document is a page from a rough draft of a deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an attorney questioning a witness about legal standards, specifically regarding a 'motion to strike' filed by Professor Dershowitz and the ethical requirement for attorneys to have a 'good-faith basis' when asking leading questions. The witness confirms their team's position regarding the motion and agrees generally with the premise regarding good-faith questioning.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Dershowitz | Subject of legal motion |
Mentioned as 'Professor Dershowitz', who filed a 'motion to strike'.
|
| Unknown Speaker Q | Interrogator/Attorney |
Asking questions regarding legal procedure and ethics.
|
| Unknown Speaker A | Witness |
Answering questions regarding their legal team's position on Dershowitz's motion.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
|
| Courts |
General reference to judicial bodies handling motions.
|
"That was our position in our response to Professor Dershowitz's motion to strike, yes."Source
"does the attorney have to have a good-faith basis to believe that that question is true or the facts assumed in that question are true?"Source
"you don't ask a leading question about a fact unless you have a good-faith basis to believe that facts is true, correct?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,281 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document