HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
1.37 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing (response to motion)
File Size:
1.37 MB
Summary
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida. They are responding to Alan Dershowitz's supplement for intervention, arguing that he has failed to provide specific evidence refuting Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite his public claims on Fox Business to the contrary.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe #1 | Plaintiff |
One of the 'current victims' filing the response.
|
| Jane Doe #2 | Plaintiff |
One of the 'current victims' filing the response.
|
| Jane Doe #3 | Witness/Alleged Victim |
Submitted an affidavit; alleges Alan Dershowitz sexually molested her.
|
| Alan M. Dershowitz | Intervenor |
Filed a Motion for Limited Intervention; accused of sexual molestation by Jane Doe #3.
|
| Lou Dobbs | Media Personality |
Host of Fox Business program where Dershowitz appeared.
|
| Marra | Judge |
Presiding Judge (implied by case number).
|
| Johnson | Judge |
Magistrate Judge (implied by case number).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Venue of the legal filing.
|
|
| United States |
Defendant in the primary case.
|
|
| Fox Business |
Network where Dershowitz was interviewed.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2015-03-24
Document entered on FLSD Docket
Southern District of Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Court location.
|
Relationships (2)
Text states Jane Doe No. 3 has allegations that he 'sexually molested her'.
Listed together as plaintiffs and 'current victims'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Dershowitz continues to hide the truth about his activities."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
Quote #1
"The affidavit proves nothing of the sort."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
Quote #2
"In neither his original reply (DE 306) nor his recent supplement (DE 317-1) has Dershowitz provided specific evidence to contest Jane Doe No. 3’s allegations that he sexually molested her."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
Quote #3
"I did the investigation in a day and was able to prove through all kinds of"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,632 characters)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 2 of 34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 9:08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson
JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2
v.
UNITED STATES
______________________________/
______________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2’S RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENT IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LMITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ
COME NOW Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (the “current victims”), by and through
undersigned counsel, to file this response to the Supplement to Reply in Support of Motion for
Limited Intervention by Alan Dershowitz (DE 317-1). Dershowitz claims that an affidavit
submitted by Jane Doe No. 3 in support of an unrelated pleading proves that she is “lying with
respect to her claims against [him].” DE 317-1 at 1. The affidavit proves nothing of the sort.
Indeed, if recent pleadings show anything, it is that Dershowitz continues to hide the truth about
his activities.
undersigned counsel, to file this response to the Supplement to Reply in Support of Motion for
Limited Intervention by Alan Dershowitz (DE 317-1). Dershowitz claims that an affidavit
submitted by Jane Doe No. 3 in support of an unrelated pleading proves that she is “lying with
respect to her claims against [him].” DE 317-1 at 1. The affidavit proves nothing of the sort.
Indeed, if recent pleadings show anything, it is that Dershowitz continues to hide the truth about
his activities.
Before turning to the specifics of what Dershowitz argues in his supplement, it is even
more important to consider what he fails to argue. In neither his original reply (DE 306) nor his
recent supplement (DE 317-1) has Dershowitz provided specific evidence to contest Jane Doe
No. 3’s allegations that he sexually molested her. This omission is revealing, because
Dershowitz has repeatedly claimed in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations
are false. For example, on January 7, 2015, on the Fox Business (Lou Dobbs) program,
Dershowitz stated: “I did the investigation in a day and was able to prove through all kinds of
more important to consider what he fails to argue. In neither his original reply (DE 306) nor his
recent supplement (DE 317-1) has Dershowitz provided specific evidence to contest Jane Doe
No. 3’s allegations that he sexually molested her. This omission is revealing, because
Dershowitz has repeatedly claimed in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations
are false. For example, on January 7, 2015, on the Fox Business (Lou Dobbs) program,
Dershowitz stated: “I did the investigation in a day and was able to prove through all kinds of
1
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document