JOHNSON
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Burton
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kennedy (Jack)
|
Political running mates |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jackie Kennedy
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Kenneth A. Marra
|
Judicial review |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Inmate Johnson moved from KN to ZA | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-07-06 | N/A | Inmate Johnson #50972-054 placed in Administrative Detention for SIS Investigation. | Unit KN | View |
| 2015-01-01 | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Johnson v. U.S. | Supreme Court | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case cited: Burton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir. 1991). | N/A | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | Democratic Nomination | USA | View |
| 1960-01-01 | N/A | Selection of Running Mate | USA | View |
Epstein_Part_12_(Redacted).pdf
This document is an excerpt from a federal indictment (Case No. 00-8124CR - HURLEY) from the Southern District of Florida, detailing charges of mail fraud and bank fraud against an individual named HURLEY. The defendant, a mortgage broker at Mortgage Express, Inc., is accused of submitting false and fraudulent information, including fictitious leases and false verifications of employment/deposit, to financial institutions like Bank of America, Republic Consumer Lending Group, and Ohio Savings Bank to obtain mortgage financing for himself and customers.
017-14.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court (S.D. Florida) dated June 25, 2010, denying Jeffrey Epstein's appeal of Magistrate Judge Johnson's discovery orders. Epstein is ordered to produce documents within three days, with specific instructions to redact names of minor sexual assault victims. The order also restricts the Plaintiff from disclosing Epstein's tax returns or passport to third parties, except for expert witnesses bound by confidentiality.
017-08.pdf
This is a court order from the Southern District of Florida dated February 11, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants in part Epstein's motion for an extension, setting a new deadline of February 26, 2010, for Epstein to appeal Magistrate Judge Johnson's prior order compelling document production. The order also stipulates that if the appeal fails, Epstein must produce the documents within three business days.
022.pdf
A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in the case of L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-81092). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case on July 20, 2010, following a stipulation by the parties, while noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
021-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated July 20, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil case (09-CIV-81092) brought by plaintiff L.M. against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
019.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on June 16, 2010, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 09-CIV-81092-Marra/Johnson). Attorneys Robert D. Critton, Jr. and Michael J. Pike of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP formally enter their appearance as counsel for the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document includes a certificate of service to Brad Edwards, counsel for the Plaintiff.
010-12.pdf
This document is a Protective Order designated as Exhibit L (and Exhibit 1) in Case 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, filed in May 2014. Issued by Judge Kenneth Marra, it grants a motion by Intervenors (led by Roy Black) to keep correspondence between themselves and the United States Attorney's Office confidential ('CDM'). The order establishes strict protocols for the handling, marking, and limited disclosure of these materials during the litigation between Jane Does #1-2 and the United States.
008.pdf
This document is a Notice of Non-Opposition filed on February 14, 2008, in the case of Jane Doe No. 1 et al. v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 1, her father, and stepmother) inform the court that they do not oppose the motion to intervene filed by Jane Doe's mother. The document lists the attorneys representing the plaintiffs from the firm Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
032.pdf
This is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated June 25, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil lawsuit brought by Jane Doe No. 8 against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of that settlement.
027-01.pdf
This document is a Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition and an associated Subpoena filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON). Plaintiff Jane Doe, represented by attorney Brad Edwards of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, commanded Jean Luc Bruhel to appear for a deposition on September 22, 2009, in New York City. The document contains the legal notice, the subpoena addressed to Bruhel at a New York address, and standard Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding subpoenas.
022-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CV-80802). The order grants the Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of December 14, 2009, to file an Amended Complaint.
011-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order filed on August 11, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It grants a motion to consolidate the case of Jane Doe No. 8 v. Jeffrey Epstein with the existing case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein for discovery purposes only.
023.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on May 19, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309) in the Southern District of Florida. The order dismisses the case following a stipulation by the parties and notes that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
022.pdf
Legal document filed on May 18, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida stipulating the dismissal with prejudice of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 10-CV-80309) brought by Jane Doe No. 103 against Jeffrey Epstein. The document indicates that a settlement was reached between the parties, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms.
022-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case in May 2010 following a stipulation by the parties, noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
012-02.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated April 1, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309). The order grants the Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer the case to Judge Marra's Division to be consolidated with eleven similar pending actions under the lead case Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80119).
053-01.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated October 29, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of November 16, 2009, for the defendant to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.
051-01.pdf
This document is a court order (likely a proposed order attached to a motion) from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The order grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of October 30, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the plaintiff's complaint.
034-01.pdf
A court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 102 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of July 5, 2009, for him to file a responsive pleading to the complaint.
057-01.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated July 2009 (entered on docket July 2, 2009). Judge Kenneth A. Marra granted Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time. Epstein was given until August 21, 2009, to file a reply to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101's response regarding a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint.
048-01.pdf
A proposed court order from the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-80591). The document grants the Plaintiff's motion for an enlargement of time and page limits to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The order allows for a response of up to 36 pages. Note: The body of the text contains a likely typographical error dating it to 'June, 2008' while the header indicates it was entered on the docket in June 2009.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on April 28, 2009. It addresses ten separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs (Jane Does and C.M.A.). The order grants the plaintiffs' motion to consolidate cases for discovery purposes and grants a protective order limiting Epstein to a single deposition per plaintiff to prevent piecemeal depositions, while also ordering parties in remaining cases to show cause why they should not also be consolidated.
010-01.pdf
This document is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of C.L. vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80447-CIV). The order grants Epstein's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file a reply to the plaintiff's response regarding a motion to dismiss/strike. The new deadline for the filing is set for June 17, 2010.
EFTA00034663.pdf
This document is a 'Daily Activity Report' memorandum from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York, dated July 7, 2019, covering activities from the previous day, July 6, 2019. It confirms the new admission of Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) to the facility. The report also highlights significant staffing shortages on the Day and Evening shifts, which forced the facility to vacate correctional assignments in '10 South' and the 'SHU' (Special Housing Unit).
EFTA00034135.pdf
This document contains three pages of the Daily Lieutenant's Log from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York for July 5-6, 2019. The logs detail routine prison operations including inmate counts, security checks, and alarm testing. A critical entry on July 5, 2019, at 9:27 PM records the movement of inmate Epstein (#76318-054) to unit 5N. Other entries note inmates at local hospitals under US Marshal guard and an inmate placed in administrative detention for investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity