This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding where a speaker is arguing for bail for a defendant. The speaker cites several precedent cases (Esposito, Madoff, Dreier, Deutsch, Conway, and Mattis) to demonstrate that defendants in serious cases, including organized crime, massive financial fraud, and violent acts, have been granted release on bail conditions and have consistently appeared for trial. The argument aims to persuade the judge that release on conditions is appropriate in the current case as well.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Esposito | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a 2019 case from Judge Marrero involving organized crime.
|
| Marrero | Judge |
Presided over the 2019 Esposito case.
|
| Madoff | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a case involving hundreds of millions of dollars.
|
| Dreier | Defendant |
Mentioned as a defendant in a case involving hundreds of millions of dollars.
|
| Deutsch | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a case involving pornography or sex crime allegations from the Eastern District.
|
| Conway | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in a case from the Northern District of California.
|
| Mattis | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case United States v. Mattis.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit | Court |
Mentioned as the court for the recent United States v. Mattis case.
|
| Eastern District | Court District |
The location from which the Deutsch case originated.
|
| Northern District of California | Court District |
The location of the Conway case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location associated with the Deutsch case.
|
|
|
The location associated with the Conway case.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,534 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document