HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265.jpg
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Document excerpt / article / legal commentary (house oversight committee record)
File Size:
Summary
This document appears to be a page from a report or article included in House Oversight Committee records (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265). It discusses the Mueller investigation, potential Supreme Court involvement, and the political implications of the November election on the President's legal and congressional standing. It features a quote from former independent prosecutor Ken Starr regarding the tendency of 'strong presidents' to win legal cases.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ken Starr | Former independent prosecutor |
Quoted regarding the likelihood of presidents winning or losing legal cases.
|
| Mueller | Special Counsel (implied) |
Mentioned as 'the Mueller team' regarding potential court outcomes.
|
| The President | President of the United States |
Subject of the legal discussion and potential Congress/Court actions.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mueller team |
Legal team investigating the President.
|
|
| Supreme Court |
Judicial body mentioned as a potential venue for the case.
|
|
| Congress |
Legislative body mentioned regarding the President's fate.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
Starr commenting on the legal pursuit of the president.
Discussion of Mueller team prevailing in courts regarding the President's fate.
Key Quotes (2)
""Might such an expansive claim win, yes. Should it win, no.""Source
— Ken Starr (implied)
(Discussing legal claims.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265.jpg
Quote #1
"weak presidents lose cases, strong presidents win them"Source
— Ken Starr
(Commentary on the correlation between political strength and legal outcomes.)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (672 characters)
shadow the November election.
Legal experts believe that the Mueller team might well prevail in lower courts with a much less certain outcome in the Supreme Court.
Were the case to reach the Supreme Court after the November election, it might well be the results of that election that help seal the President's fate not just in Congress but also in the courts.
"Might such an expansive claim win, yes. Should it win, no." But everyone knows the reality: weak presidents lose cases, strong presidents win them," said Ken Starr, the former independent prosecutor who might know more about the legal pursuit of the president than anyone else on earth.
Legal experts believe that the Mueller team might well prevail in lower courts with a much less certain outcome in the Supreme Court.
Were the case to reach the Supreme Court after the November election, it might well be the results of that election that help seal the President's fate not just in Congress but also in the courts.
"Might such an expansive claim win, yes. Should it win, no." But everyone knows the reality: weak presidents lose cases, strong presidents win them," said Ken Starr, the former independent prosecutor who might know more about the legal pursuit of the president than anyone else on earth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030265
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document