HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg

2.84 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Deposition transcript
File Size: 2.84 MB
Summary

This document is a deposition transcript (pages 110-113) from a congressional oversight file. The witness (likely Scott Rothstein based on context) admits to running a Ponzi scheme with co-conspirator Russell Adler. The testimony reveals that the 'Epstein case' was used as part of the pitch for the Ponzi scheme. The witness discusses an employee, Ms. Holmes (former federal law enforcement), who worked on Epstein cases, and Brad Edwards, an attorney whose compensation and work on the Epstein case are scrutinized.

People (7)

Name Role Context
The Witness Deponent/Defendant
Admits to running a Ponzi scheme, mentions co-conspirator Russell Adler. (Context implies this is likely Scott Rothst...
Brad Edwards Attorney/Employee
Worked on the Epstein case. Witness discusses his salary and bonuses.
Russell Adler Co-conspirator
Identified by the witness as a co-conspirator deeply involved in the Ponzi scheme.
Ms. Holmes Employee/Former Law Enforcement
Former federal law enforcement (FBI or IRS), worked on Epstein cases. Witness may have asked her to use contacts for ...
Mr. Jenne Colleague
Someone the witness may have asked for information.
Mr. Goldberger Attorney
Conducting the questioning (Q).
Mr. Scarola Attorney
Makes an objection during the deposition.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Friedman, Lombardi & Olson
Court reporting firm listed in footer
FBI
Mentioned as possible former employer of Ms. Holmes
IRS
Mentioned as possible former employer of Ms. Holmes
House Oversight Committee
Implied by footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518'

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
The Epstein case being used as part of the Ponzi scheme pitch.
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Where the witness and colleagues worked

Relationships (3)

The Witness Co-conspirators Russell Adler
Witness states: 'I had a co-conspirator... Mr. Adler.'
The Witness Employer/Employee Ms. Holmes
Witness discusses hiring her and directing her work.
The Witness Colleague/Supervisor Brad Edwards
Witness discusses determining his bonus and asking about his cases.

Key Quotes (4)

"I had a co-conspirator who was deeply involved in the Ponzi scheme that I could go to to get any information I wanted, Mr. Adler."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg
Quote #1
"I may have asked Ms. Holmes to get me information that I was going to utilize with my co-conspirators in the Ponzi scheme, but Ms. Holmes did not know that there was a Ponzi scheme going on."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg
Quote #2
"Epstein case was used as part of the Ponzi scheme?"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg
Quote #3
"we would learn that by looking at when the Epstein case was brought into the Ponzi scheme"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,322 characters)

1 A. If you are including within that me walking
2 past Brad in the hall and saying, "Hey, Brad how are
3 you? How is the Epstein stuff going?" Then it's very
4 likely that I talked to him about it in that manner.
5 But I have no specific recollection one way or the
6 other as to having any lengthy conversations with
7 Mr. Edwards about the case.
8 I had a co-conspirator who was deeply
9 involved in the Ponzi scheme that I could go to to get
10 any information I wanted, Mr. Adler. I didn't need to
11 go to Mr. Edwards.
12 Q. So if you had a question of your
13 co-conspirator, Russell Adler, about the Epstein case,
14 you would go ask Adler and would Adler always have the
15 answer for you or would he say he would get you the
16 answer?
17 A. Both.
18 Q. When he didn't have the answer, do you know
19 who he was getting the answer from?
20 MR. SCAROLA: Objection, predicate.
21 THE WITNESS: I don't know who he was
22 getting it from and I may have contacted other people
23 in the office who were working on the file to ask. I
24 may have asked Mr. Jenne, I may have asked Ms.
25 Holmes, I many have asked a whole myriad of people.
Page 110
1 BY MR. GOLDBERGER:
2 Q. So Ms. Holmes was working on the Epstein
3 cases?
4 A. It's my refreshed recollection from seeing
5 one of those e-mails that she must have been.
6 Q. Okay. And Ms. Holmes you said was a former
7 federal law enforcement officer, was that your
8 testimony?
9 A. Yes.
10 Q. You don't know whether she was FBI or IRS,
11 correct?
12 A. I don't remember.
13 Q. Okay. And upon reflection, do you know
14 whether she was hired without your say-so based on
15 what Mr. Jenne told you or did you meet with her?
16 A. No, I actually -- I remember meeting with
17 Ms. Holmes.
18 Q. Okay. What do you remember about that
19 meeting?
20 A. I remember talking about her relative who
21 was a judge. I remember her telling me about her time
22 in law enforcement. I just don't remember which
23 agency.
24 Q. Did she tell you why she left law
25 enforcement?
Page 111
1 A. She may have, I don't recall one way or the
2 other.
3 Q. Did you ever ask Ms. Holmes to use any of
4 her prior contacts in law enforcement to assist you in
5 the Ponzi scheme to get information for you?
6 A. The question is kind of convoluted because
7 the way you are asking it, it seems like you are
8 intimating that Ms. Holmes knew. I may have asked
9 Ms. Holmes to get me information that I was going to
10 utilize with my co-conspirators in the Ponzi scheme,
11 but Ms. Holmes did not know that there was a Ponzi
12 scheme going on.
13 Q. All right. So you may have asked Ms. Holmes
14 to try and get some information for you from her
15 contacts in law enforcement, but it's your testimony,
16 and I don't dispute it, it's your testimony that she
17 knew nothing about the Ponzi scheme, correct?
18 A. I may have, I may not have. I do not
19 remember and she absolutely knew nothing about the
20 Ponzi scheme.
21 Q. Okay. Now, we talked about Brad Edwards
22 getting paid and the multilevel ways in which you
23 determined what a person's salary was. Do you know
24 whether Brad Edwards got any bonuses along the way
25 once the Epstein case was used as part of the Ponzi
Page 112
1 scheme?
2 A. He did not.
3 Q. So he was --
4 A. If he got a bonus, it was something he
5 earned.
6 Q. Did you make a determination as to what that
7 bonus would be?
8 A. If he got a bonus, I would have been
9 instrumental in determining it. You can determine if
10 he got a bonus by looking at our financial records, I
11 don't have an independent recollection one way or the
12 other.
13 Q. So you don't know whether he got a bonus at
14 all, correct?
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. So I assume that if he got a bonus you
17 wouldn't know whether it occurred before or after the
18 Epstein case was used as part of the Ponzi scheme?
19 A. I don't know if he got a bonus, which means
20 I wouldn't know the time frame.
21 Q. But we would learn -- you are instructing
22 us, we would learn that by looking at when the Epstein
23 case was brought into the Ponzi scheme and we learn
24 that by looking at these -- what was the group that it
25 was used to pitch to?
Page 113
29 (Pages 110 to 113)
FRIEDMAN, LOMBARDI & OLSON
305-371-6677
5ed93085-0554-447f-bcdd-ca2d8fe941df
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document