DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
486 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
486 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms staying in a New York building with Dave Rogers and seeing other 'Epstein employees' there, specifically identifying Sarah Kellen in a '66th Street building'. The questioning concludes on this topic before shifting to a ranch in New Mexico.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Visoski | Witness |
The person being cross-examined, as indicated by the header 'Visoski - cross'.
|
| Dave Rogers |
Mentioned as someone who stayed with the witness (Visoski) on trips to New York.
|
|
| Epstein | Employer (implied) |
Mentioned in the context of 'Epstein employees' staying at a building.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Epstein employee (implied) |
Named as an example of an employee the witness saw in the 66th Street building.
|
| Jane | Referenced individual |
A name used by the questioner to refer to a woman the witness confirms they never saw at the location.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Visoski as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Visoski
Unnamed Questioner
The witness (Visoski) and Dave Rogers took trips to New York and stayed in a building there.
New York
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination for trips where the witness and Dave Rogers stayed in a specific building.
|
|
|
The location where the witness saw Sarah Kellen.
|
|
|
Mentioned in the context of a ranch, as the next topic of questioning.
|
Relationships (3)
They traveled together and stayed at the same location on trips to New York.
Visoski confirms seeing Sarah Kellen, another implied Epstein employee, at the 66th Street building.
The questioner refers to 'Epstein employees' and then uses Sarah Kellen as an example.
Key Quotes (3)
"But it's safe to say that you and Dave Rogers stayed there on your trips to New York?"Source
— Questioner
(Questioning the witness about their accommodation during trips to New York.)
DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
Quote #1
"For example, you saw Sarah Kellen in the 66th Street building; is that right?"Source
— Questioner
(Asking the witness to confirm seeing a specific Epstein employee at a specific location.)
DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
Quote #2
"The other person was the one we can't say the name."Source
— Visoski
(Responding to a question about other people seen at the building, referring to an individual whose name cannot be mentioned in the proceeding.)
DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,163 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 743 Filed 08/10/22 Page 109 of 247 237
LBUCmax3
Visoski - cross
LBUCmax3
Visoski - cross
1 apartments?
2 A. I don't know the actual business of it. It was to my
3 knowledge that he owned the building.
4 Q. But it's safe to say that you and Dave Rogers stayed there
5 on your trips to New York?
6 A. That is correct.
7 Q. Do you know if any other Epstein employees stayed there?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. So you saw some other employees in the building when you
10 were there; right?
11 A. Correct.
12 Q. For example, you saw Sarah Kellen in the 66th Street
13 building; is that right?
14 A. That's correct.
15 Q. Do you remember any others you saw there?
16 A. The other person was the one we can't say the name.
17 Q. Okay. So you saw the person whose photographs we just
18 looked at, LV3A and LV3B; right?
19 A. That is correct, yes.
20 Q. You saw that woman in that apartment building?
21 A. That is correct, yes.
22 Q. But you never saw the woman we're referring to as Jane
23 there, did you?
24 A. No, not -- no.
25 Q. All right. Now, for the ranch in New Mexico, your
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017471
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document