Dave Rogers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Source of information |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Lodging | Witness stayed in an apartment at 301 East 66th Street, provided by their employer, Epstein. | 301 East 66th Street, New York | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness (Visoski) and Dave Rogers took trips to New York and stayed in a building there. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Production of flight logs by Dave Rogers. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of additional flight logs from Dave Rogers. | Unknown | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Trip | The process of scheduling flights was discussed. It involved receiving a page from Epstein's offi... | Epstein's office | View |
017-20.pdf
This affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards details difficulties in discovery for a civil case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 10-81111). It alleges that key witnesses Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. Crucially, it lists specific individuals for whom Epstein paid legal fees to prevent them from testifying against him, explicitly labeling Sarah Kellen as a 'procurer of girls' and Nadia Marcinkova as a 'live-in sex slave', while also identifying his personal pilots and household staff.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
015-01.pdf
Affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards in Case 10-81111 detailing obstruction tactics by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. The document asserts that Jean Luc Brunel visited Epstein 67 times in jail and that both Brunel and Ghislaine Maxwell evaded depositions by falsely claiming to be out of the country. It explicitly lists Epstein's inner circle (including pilots and household staff like Sarah Kellen and Nadia Marcinkova) and notes that Epstein paid for their legal counsel to control their testimony.
008.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
DOJ-OGR-00017434.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony describes the communication process for scheduling flights in the 1990s, which involved receiving a message on a beeper from Epstein's office and then calling back to speak with a secretary or assistant to make the arrangements. The witness confirms this procedure and also mentions occasionally speaking with someone named Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00017471.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The witness confirms staying in a New York building with Dave Rogers and seeing other 'Epstein employees' there, specifically identifying Sarah Kellen in a '66th Street building'. The questioning concludes on this topic before shifting to a ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00017470.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski, who worked for Epstein, describes their lodging arrangements, stating they stayed at their own home near Palm Beach but were provided with a corporate apartment at 301 East 66th Street in New York, a building owned by Epstein. Visoski confirms that their partner and copilot, Dave Rogers, also stayed at the same New York location.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013344.jpg
This document details legal obstruction in the Epstein case, specifically concerning Jean Luc Brunel, who evaded a deposition by falsely claiming to be in France while actually staying at Epstein's West Palm Beach home. It further alleges that Epstein paid for the legal representation of a vast network of associates—including pilots, house staff, Ghislaine Maxwell, and his brother—making it nearly impossible for plaintiffs to secure independent testimony.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021908.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview. The speaker discusses suspicions regarding flight logs provided by Bruce Rinehart, a former AUSA who went to work near and allegedly for Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the logs showed approximately ten flights involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein, and suggests the term 'one female' in the logs may have been a code word for an underage girl.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021907.jpg
This is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021907). A witness testifies that flight logs produced by Mr. Dershowitz to Detective Riccari of the Palm Beach Police Department were 'incomplete and inaccurate,' raising concerns that Dershowitz had 'sanitized' the logs. The witness further mentions receiving additional flight logs from an individual named Dave Rogers for comparison.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021906.jpg
This document is page 83 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness testifies that pilot Dave Rogers produced flight logs during sex abuse litigation against Epstein. The witness notes that when these logs were compared to logs provided by Mr. Dershowitz to the Palm Beach Police Department, inconsistencies were found, arousing suspicion. The testimony is briefly interrupted by Mr. Scott, who reports receiving a call from Epstein's lawyer, Darrin Indyke, regarding technical phone issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity