DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
649 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
649 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney is arguing for the release of their client (inferred to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on the grounds that reviewing voluminous electronic discovery for 'conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old' is impossible while the client is in custody during the pandemic. The attorney notes the client is in 'administrative seg.' (segregation) because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein' (referencing his death in custody).
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Epstein | Deceased Subject |
Mentioned regarding a separate investigation and as the reason the current client is in administrative segregation ('...
|
| Our Client | Defendant |
The subject of the hearing (likely Ghislaine Maxwell given the context of case 21-770 and Epstein connection), curren...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge presiding over the hearing.
|
| Defense Attorney | Speaker |
Unidentified speaker arguing for the client's release/bail.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bureau of Prisons |
Mentioned regarding custody conditions.
|
|
| Marshal Service |
Mentioned regarding custody conditions.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| Government |
The prosecution.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-04-01
Court hearing regarding bail/release conditions and discovery review difficulties due to the pandemic.
Court
Defense Counsel
Judge
Prosecution (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction (SDNY) based on the court reporter stamp.
|
Relationships (1)
Speaker mentions 'investigation of our client and there is the investigation of Mr. Epstein' and notes the client is in segregation because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein'.
Key Quotes (5)
"There is the investigation of our client and there is the investigation of Mr. Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
Quote #1
"The notion that we would be able to in any meaningful way review these with our client to prepare the case... under the current pandemic situation is just not realistic."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
Quote #2
"We have conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
Quote #3
"limited access in some form of administrative seg., apparently because they are afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
Quote #4
"the conditions and combination of conditions to secure her release can be satisfied here"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,700 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page131 of 200
68
k7e2MaxC kjc
68
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 investigations. There is the investigation of our client and
2 there is the investigation of Mr. Epstein. And they are, in
3 the government's words, in our words together, voluminous
4 materials. We haven't seen any of it yet, but voluminous,
5 including voluminous electronic materials. The notion that we
6 would be able to in any meaningful way review these with our
7 client to prepare the case for motion and for trial under the
8 current pandemic situation is just not realistic. It is not
9 meaningful. It is not fair. And I should say, as your Honor
10 noted, in the Stephens case, we are not faulting the Bureau of
11 Prisons. We are not faulting the Marshal Service. We
12 understand they are doing the best they can under the
13 circumstances. But this is just not realistic. We have
14 conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old. You have extensive
15 discovery that's going to take the government, if they hit the
16 deadlines your Honor set -- and we all know that sometimes it
17 doesn't happen -- four and a half months to provide, and the
18 government wants our client to remain in custody that whole
19 time, without being able to meet with us in person, with
20 limited access in some form of administrative seg., apparently
21 because they are afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein, I
22 don't know, and it is just not a realistic way to prepare a
23 case, particularly, your Honor, when, as we submit, the
24 conditions and combination of conditions to secure her release
25 can be satisfied here under your Honor's guidance.
2 there is the investigation of Mr. Epstein. And they are, in
3 the government's words, in our words together, voluminous
4 materials. We haven't seen any of it yet, but voluminous,
5 including voluminous electronic materials. The notion that we
6 would be able to in any meaningful way review these with our
7 client to prepare the case for motion and for trial under the
8 current pandemic situation is just not realistic. It is not
9 meaningful. It is not fair. And I should say, as your Honor
10 noted, in the Stephens case, we are not faulting the Bureau of
11 Prisons. We are not faulting the Marshal Service. We
12 understand they are doing the best they can under the
13 circumstances. But this is just not realistic. We have
14 conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old. You have extensive
15 discovery that's going to take the government, if they hit the
16 deadlines your Honor set -- and we all know that sometimes it
17 doesn't happen -- four and a half months to provide, and the
18 government wants our client to remain in custody that whole
19 time, without being able to meet with us in person, with
20 limited access in some form of administrative seg., apparently
21 because they are afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein, I
22 don't know, and it is just not a realistic way to prepare a
23 case, particularly, your Honor, when, as we submit, the
24 conditions and combination of conditions to secure her release
25 can be satisfied here under your Honor's guidance.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001072
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document