Trove
Sign In Sign Up

defense attorney

Person
Mentions
14
Relationships
14
Events
30
Documents
7
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
14 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Loftus
Witness counsel
6
2
View
person Ivan Robles
Client
5
1
View
person Assistant State Attorney
Conflict of interest
5
1
View
person client (defendant)
Legal representative
5
1
View
person defendant
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization Haddon Morgan
Employment collegial
5
1
View
person NY Daily News Reporter
Source journalist
5
1
View
person Loftus
Witness examiner
5
1
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
5
1
View
location United States
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Unknown Supervisory Staff Attorney
Professional
1
1
View
person Assistant US Attorney
Legal representative
1
1
View
person unnamed inmate
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding forensic psychology definitions and document review. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding psychology of false allegations. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination testimony of witness 'Jane'. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Evidentiary hearing regarding the scope of the plea agreement. District Court View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Loftus regarding false memory studies. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination testimony of witness Rocchio regarding expert opinion and methodology. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding scope of witness testimony Courtroom View
N/A Legal case A recently convicted sex offender in Las Vegas, Nevada, is seeking to appeal his conviction based... Las Vegas, Nevada View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of Jane regarding government questioning. Courtroom View
2025-01-15 N/A Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding delayed disclosure studies. Courtroom View
2022-08-22 N/A Court filing date of the transcript document. Southern District of New York View
2022-08-10 N/A Cross-examination of Alessi in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Courtroom (SDNY) View
2022-08-10 N/A Cross-examination testimony of witness Visoski in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer during trial. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding Cross-examination of witness Alessi in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony filing date. Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghisla... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding flight logs. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding Cross-examination of witness Rodgers in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. N/A View
2021-04-01 N/A Bail proceeding hearing Court View
2021-04-01 N/A Court hearing/Oral argument regarding the case. Court View
2020-12-10 N/A Court Hearing regarding detention and trial preparation Southern District (Courtroom) View
2019-12-06 Media inquiry A reporter from the NY Daily News submitted an inquiry for a story about morale at MCC in Manhatt... MCC in Manhattan View
2019-08-16 N/A A defense attorney representing an inmate at MCC called an official with information/tip regardin... Phone Call View

DOJ-OGR-00001073.jpg

A page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, featuring arguments by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney. The attorney argues that the government's citations of 'dangerousness cases' are irrelevant to Maxwell's situation and emphasizes the impossibility of preparing for trial while Maxwell is detained during the COVID-19 crisis, citing lack of in-person access to the client due to BOP restrictions. The Judge attempts to interject at the bottom of the page.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001072.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021. A defense attorney is arguing for the release of their client (inferred to be Ghislaine Maxwell) on the grounds that reviewing voluminous electronic discovery for 'conduct that's alleged to be 25 years old' is impossible while the client is in custody during the pandemic. The attorney notes the client is in 'administrative seg.' (segregation) because authorities are 'afraid of what happened with Mr. Epstein' (referencing his death in custody).

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001064.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, concerning a bail application. The defense attorney argues against a deep investigation into the detained client's finances, specifically addressing a 2016 real estate transaction of $15 million (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse sale). The defense disputes the government's claim that the client retains $14 million in liquid assets, citing liabilities and litigation expenses, while referencing legal precedents (Khashoggi, Dreier) regarding bail amounts.

Court transcript (bail proceeding)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001059.jpg

A transcript page from a court proceeding (dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues that the government is misrepresenting the circumstances of their client's arrest to influence the judge and media. The attorney details that the client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell based on the description) was in pajamas with one security guard, the doors were unlocked, and she moved to another room as a safety protocol rather than attempting to flee when FBI agents raided the property.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000542.jpg

Transcript from a July 24, 2019 court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) where Epstein's defense argues for his release. The defense claims Epstein 'disciplined himself' and cites a 14-year gap in allegations (referencing 2002 and 2005) as proof he is no longer a danger. The Judge ('The Court') challenges this position, quoting the defense's previous letter which stated any danger had 'abated' or 'evaporated.'

Court transcript / legal filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018601.jpg

This legal document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing an argument about witness tampering. An attorney informs the judge that a witness who already testified contacted a future witness, Brian, to discuss their testimony, potentially violating a sequestration order. The attorney requests that Brian be barred from testifying, while another attorney, Ms. Moe, begins a counterargument by citing legal rules regarding witness exclusion.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00013023.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) and defense (Ms. Menninger) are discussing a potential violation regarding witness communication. Specifically, a witness named 'Jane' called an individual named 'Brian' after her testimony to warn him that the defense attorney was an 'expletive' and mentioned being shown an 'Interlochen application' during cross-examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
6
As Recipient
2
Total
8

Target Letter

From: The Department (DOJ)
To: defense attorney

Notifies a defendant of the general nature of the government's criminal investigation.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: defense attorney
To: Ms. Chapell

Discussion regarding Exhibit 801-R, an invoice from 2002.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: defense attorney
To: Loftus

Discussion regarding the reliability of memory involving trauma and the correlation between confidence and accuracy in memory retrieval.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Sentencing/Conditions Argument

From: defense attorney
To: Court

Oral argument regarding the inhumane conditions at MCC and requesting consideration for time served.

Meeting
2021-06-15
Communication Source

Dispute over arrest details

From: defense attorney
To: Judge

Defense argues the government misrepresented the client's behavior during arrest as fleeing rather than following security protocol.

Oral argument
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Information from MCC inmate

From: defense attorney
To: Original Email Sender

Attorney called with information regarding Epstein/MCC.

Call
2019-08-16
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: defense attorney
To: Assistant U.S. Attorney

Agreeing to set a time for Tuesday morning.

Email
2019-07-07
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Assistant U.S. Attorney
To: defense attorney

Offering to schedule a call on Tuesday, possibly before the attorney meets with the client.

Email
2019-07-07
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search