This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court order and docket entries
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed the order regarding redactions and sealing; recipient of joint letters
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Author of Joint Letter regarding Proposed Juror Strikes
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
|
| Administrator Feldman | Administrator |
Filed a Motion to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena on Nov 19, 2021
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness (Pseudonym) |
Filed Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify; subject of filings
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (Court)
|
|
| USA |
Plaintiff/Prosecution (United States of America)
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Appellate Court referenced in case citation
|
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga |
Referenced in case citation (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga)
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York Court
|
"The Court concludes that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect information subject to Fed. R. Evid. 412 and the privacy interests of witnesses"Source
"The Court concludes, however, that the proposed redactions to Dkt. No. 725 are not narrowly tailored."Source
"Because docketing the letters would not undermine the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy, the parties are ORDERED to docket the three letters"Source
"Any proposed redactions must be justified by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,250 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document