DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg

1.2 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / legal order
File Size: 1.2 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 2022. It details an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the unsealing and docketing of previously undocketed motions and letters from November and December 2021 related to juror strikes, jury questionnaires, and subpoenas. The order addresses privacy concerns under Fed. R. Evid. 412 and mandates the parties to confer on redactions for specific documents involving a witness identified as 'Jane' and an 'Administrator Feldman'.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court order and docket entries
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed the order regarding redactions and sealing; recipient of joint letters
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Author of Joint Letter regarding Proposed Juror Strikes
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letters regarding Jury questionnaires and Filings from Jane
Administrator Feldman Administrator
Filed a Motion to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena on Nov 19, 2021
Jane Victim/Witness (Pseudonym)
Filed Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify; subject of filings

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
SDNY
Southern District of New York (Court)
USA
Plaintiff/Prosecution (United States of America)
Second Circuit
Appellate Court referenced in case citation
Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
Referenced in case citation (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga)

Timeline (2 events)

2022-07-13
Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan
SDNY Court
Judge Alison J. Nathan Ghislaine Maxwell Government Counsel
2022-07-14
Docketing of previously undocketed letters and sealing of documents
SDNY Court
Clerk of Court Counsel

Locations (1)

Location Context
Southern District of New York Court

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Christian R. Everdell
Joint Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell... from Christian R. Everdell
Jane Adversarial/Legal Ghislaine Maxwell
Jane's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify

Key Quotes (4)

"The Court concludes that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect information subject to Fed. R. Evid. 412 and the privacy interests of witnesses"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court concludes, however, that the proposed redactions to Dkt. No. 725 are not narrowly tailored."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
Quote #2
"Because docketing the letters would not undermine the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy, the parties are ORDERED to docket the three letters"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
Quote #3
"Any proposed redactions must be justified by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020728.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,250 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page110 of 208
A-106
2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
07/13/2022 726 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions to motions that were not previously docketed. See Dkt. No. 698. With one exception, the Court concludes that the proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to protect information subject to Fed. R. Evid. 412 and the privacy interests of witnesses, including individuals subject to the Court's pseudonym order, and individuals who were anticipated to be called as witnesses at trial, but were not ultimately called. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Court will file unredacted copies of all items under seal. The Court concludes, however, that the proposed redactions to Dkt. No. 725 are not narrowly tailored. The private information of victim-witnesses who are discussed in the letter may be protected by narrow redactions. However, there is no basis to redact the letter's general request to identify the proper scope of cross-examination. Accordingly, the Defendant is ORDERED to confer with the Government and docket proposed revised redactions on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022. The letter at Dkt. No. 725 was filed under temporary seal at Dkt. No. 712. Because the Court concludes that sealing in not justified, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike the entry at Dkt. No. 712 from the docket. The Court's Chambers also received an email from Defense counsel inquiring whether to docket three joint letters regarding jury strikes that were previously filed with the Court, but not docketed. Because docketing the letters would not undermine the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy, the parties are ORDERED to docket the three letters on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022. Finally, to ensure a complete record, the Court has identified four additional documents that have not previously been docketed nor subject of a sealing request: November 19, 2021 Administrator Feldman's Motion to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena, with exhibits November 22, 2021 Defendant's Response to Motions to Quash Defendant's Rule 17(c)(3) subpoena December 6, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Call Counsel to Testify December 15, 2021 Jane's Opposition to Defendant's December 13, 2021 Motion to Call Counsel to Testify The parties are ORDERED to confer with each other and counsel for the relevant movants and indicate on or before 12:00 p.m. on Friday, July 15, 2022, whether there are any requests to seal or redact the outstanding documents. Any documents not subject to a sealing request must be docketed on ECF by that same date. Any proposed redactions must be justified by reference to the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. This resolves Dkt. No. 698. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 7/13/2022) (ap) Modified on 7/14/2022 (ap). (Entered: 07/13/2022)
07/14/2022 727 JOINT LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated 11/14/21 re: Proposed Juror Strikes (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 07/14/2022)
07/14/2022 728 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. (jus) (Entered: 07/14/2022)
07/14/2022 729 JOINT LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 7, 2021 re: Jury questionnaires Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2022)
07/14/2022 730 JOINT LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 13, 2021 re: Juror questionnaires Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 07/14/2022)
07/14/2022 731 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated July 14, 2022 re: Filings from Jane Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 106/113
DOJ-OGR-00020728

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document