DOJ-OGR-00021833.jpg

670 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
6
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 670 KB
Summary

This legal document page outlines the timeline of legal actions involving Epstein and Maxwell following Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It details Epstein's 2019 indictment and death, followed by Maxwell's indictment and a subsequent superseding indictment by the SDNY in 2021. The core of the text describes Maxwell's unsuccessful motion to dismiss her indictment by leveraging the language of Epstein's NPA, a motion which the District Court denied.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Epstein
Mentioned as having a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), pleading guilty on June 30, 2008, being indicted in July 2019,...
Maxwell
Mentioned as being indicted, charged with crimes, and moving to dismiss an indictment based on Epstein's NPA. She was...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
SDNY government agency
Southern District of New York, which indicted Epstein in 2019 and added a superseding indictment against Maxwell in 2...
SDFL government agency
Southern District of Florida, where a proposed indictment was resolved by the NPA.
District Court government agency
The court that denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss and ordered the government to disclose evidence to her.

Timeline (6 events)

2008-06-30
Epstein pled guilty in state court.
state court
2019-07
Epstein was indicted in the SDNY on charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy.
SDNY
2019-08-10
Epstein died by suicide.
2021-03-29
The SDNY added a sex trafficking offense (Count Six) in its superseding indictment against Maxwell.
SDNY
Maxwell moved to dismiss the indictment based on the clear language of the NPA.
Maxwell's motion to dismiss was denied without a hearing or discovery.
District Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of conduct related to Epstein's sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.
Location of conduct related to Epstein's sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.

Relationships (1)

Epstein co-conspirator Maxwell
The document states Maxwell's motion sought to use the 'co-conspirator clause' of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to bind other districts, implying a legal connection as co-conspirators.

Key Quotes (1)

"any evidence supporting a defense under the NPA."
Source
— District Court (A quote from the District Court's order to the government to disclose evidence to Maxwell, mentioned in a footnote.)
DOJ-OGR-00021833.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,611 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 117, 11/01/2024, 3636586, Page9 of 51
limitation were negotiated. SA78. Relying on the NPA, Epstein pled guilty in state
court on June 30, 2008, and fulfilled all his promises. SA137.
In July of 2019, Epstein was indicted in the SDNY on charges of sex
trafficking and conspiracy related to conduct in Florida and New York between
2003 and 2005. He died by suicide on August 10, 2019. One year later, Maxwell
was indicted. Initially, Maxwell was charged with crimes in the 1994 to 1997
timeframe, in an apparent effort to circumvent the time frame covered by the NPA.
However, on March 29, 2021, the SDNY added in its superseding indictment, a sex
trafficking offense (Count Six) related to conduct and offenses wholly within the
timeframe and subject matter covered by the NPA and contained in the proposed
indictment in SDFL that was resolved by the NPA. A114. Doc 293 at p10 as
referenced in A45.
Maxwell moved to dismiss the indictment based on the clear language of the
NPA. Alternatively, in the event that the court determined that the language of the
NPA was ambiguous, Maxwell, who was not a party to the agreement, sought
discovery and a hearing to establish affirmative evidence of intent to bind other
districts consistent with the plain language in the co-conspirator clause. Her motion
was denied without a hearing or discovery.³ A145. The District Court found that
³ While the District Court did not order discovery, it did order the government to disclose to
Maxwell “any evidence supporting a defense under the NPA.” A145. The government responded
4
DOJ-OGR-00021833

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document