| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Investigation | A prior investigation in Florida into conduct related to Epstein. | Florida | View |
This document is a post-indictment (circa July 2019) investigative summary by federal authorities detailing the history of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein from 2005 to 2019. It outlines his sexual abuse of minors in New York, Florida, and other locations, specifically noting that victims were as young as 14 and were paid $200-$300 per encounter. The text mentions cooperating witnesses (Victim-1, 2, and 3), the role of redacted co-conspirators in recruiting minors, and the prosecution's intent to pursue these co-conspirators following Epstein's indictment.
This document is a printout of email metadata dated February 22, 2021. The subject line is 'FW: Question re SDFL Epstein file', referencing the Southern District of Florida's files on Jeffrey Epstein. The sender and primary recipients are redacted, but a Bcc recipient is listed as 'USAHUB-USAJournal111'. The document appears to be an internal log or record of the email transmission.
This document is an email from August 30, 2019, sent by an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) providing a status update on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's co-conspirators. It details interviews conducted in late August with multiple victims who implicated Ghislaine Maxwell in recruitment and abuse. The email also outlines upcoming investigative steps, including travel to Florida (delayed by Hurricane Dorian) and California to interview former staff members, including a personal assistant from 2004 and a long-time 'house man' in New York.
This document is a highly sensitive internal email chain and status update from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated September 3, 2019. It details the progress of the investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators following his death, listing specific interviews conducted with victims (including Victim-2 and Victim-3) and scheduling plans for upcoming interviews with former staff, including a 'house man' and assistants. The memo discusses evidence against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding recruitment and details the involvement of a specific scheduler who denied knowing the victims' ages.
An email chain from June 21, 2019, between a Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and another individual. The correspondence involves the transfer of critical documents related to the Epstein case, specifically a 'prosecution memo' and an 'SDFL decision' (likely referencing the Southern District of Florida's previous handling of the case), shortly before Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 involving Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Attorney Christian Everdell raises seven specific discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to access files on disks via the prison computer, missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and significant metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Epstein's devices show modification dates (July 2020) well after his death and device seizure. The email specifically requests metadata overlays to correct these issues and inquires about a gap in document production numbers.
This document is a chain of internal emails from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated between July 31 and August 10, 2020. The correspondence focuses on preparing for discovery deadlines and potential arrests/indictments, specifically reviewing old files from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The emails detail a search for evidence regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's status in the original Florida case, citing Grand Jury testimony where an agent described Maxwell meeting 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago.
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated July-August 2020. They are discussing the extent of Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement and mention in the original Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation, specifically reviewing grand jury testimony and search warrants. The text quotes an agent's testimony stating Maxwell met 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago and introduced her to Epstein, after which she began providing massages.
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Henry Pitman arguing for the detention of Jeffrey Epstein pending trial. The government asserts that Epstein poses an extreme flight risk due to his vast wealth, international ties, and lack of family connections, and presents a danger to the community given the serious nature of the sex trafficking charges and potential for witness obstruction. The letter outlines the evidence against Epstein, his history, and legal arguments supporting pre-trial detention.
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in Spring 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties Maxwell faced in reviewing digital evidence at the MDC prison (specifically reading disks vs. hard drives), missing attachments for over 109,000 emails, and metadata discrepancies for 'carved' or deleted files recovered from Jeffrey Epstein's devices. The correspondence details the logistical back-and-forth regarding file formats, USAfx transfers, and the potential need for judicial intervention (Judge Nathan) to force the MDC to accept specific hard drives.
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser; Haddon, Morgan & Foreman) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes. The defense raises seven key issues, including over 109,000 emails missing attachments, metadata discrepancies on files extracted from Epstein's devices, and difficulties providing discovery materials to Maxwell at the MDC due to technical and bureaucratic limitations. The prosecution responds with technical explanations regarding FBI CART processes, 'carved' or deleted files lacking metadata, and the conversion of VHS/cassette tapes.
This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and US prosecutors (USANYS). The defense raises seven specific technical issues regarding discovery, including the need to provide evidence on hard drives rather than disks for the prison computer, over 100,000 emails missing attachments, and metadata discrepancies where files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices show creation dates after his death (July 2020). The email also mentions videos from SDFL and PBPD investigations.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser LLP) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The defense raises several technical discovery issues, including the inability of Maxwell to read discovery disks on the prison computer, missing email attachments, and corrupted metadata on files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's devices (showing 2020 dates instead of original dates). The prosecution forwards these issues to their contractor (PAE) to address.
This document is an email sent on May 14, 2019, by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'NDGA filings' and it includes attachments referencing proposals and an order from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) dated in May. The identities of the sender and recipient are redacted.
This document is an internal email chain from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 6-7, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein's historical state plea transcript. An Assistant U.S. Attorney highlights specific quotes from the plea hearing where the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida was detailed, explicitly noting that federal prosecutors agreed not to prosecute Epstein federally in SDFL if he completed probation. The email also notes that SDFL representatives were present in court during the plea.
An email exchange dated April 19, 2021, involving a Paralegal Specialist from the United States Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns staffing a team (increased to eight people) and distributing a memo titled '2021.04.19_SDFL_Boxes_-_Paralegal_Review_Protocol.pdf', likely related to the review of evidence boxes from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between attorneys at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing a recent opinion by Judge Nathan in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The team arranges a weekend conference call to discuss the Judge's order requiring the government to confirm its position on evidence supporting Maxwell's interpretation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). One email also references a previous letter regarding discovery materials obtained from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL).
This document is an internal email from an Assistant US Attorney at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated February 17, 2021. The sender discusses a defense motion regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), noting that the defense is using a Southern District of Florida (SDFL) privilege log to argue that investigations were coordinated. The sender is attempting to identify a specific attorney (whose name is redacted) mentioned in that log who allegedly had handwritten notes, but cannot find any record of this person in NY registration or SDNY files.
An email chain from December 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The SDNY prosecutor is requesting a 'key' to decode the 'Jane Doe' numbers assigned to victims in the prior Florida investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, noting they cannot match the numbers to names to verify if they are current witnesses. The Florida contact responds that they will look into it.
An email chain from February 2021 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and another office (likely Southern District of Florida). SDNY requests a specific document ('Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680') from the 'SDFL Epstein file' referenced in a privilege log connected to the CVRA lawsuit. The responding office cites technical issues with vendor scans and a reduced 25% in-office work schedule, necessitating a staff member to drive in specifically to locate the physical document.
This document is an email metadata record dated February 18, 2021. The subject line 'RE: Question re SDFL Epstein file' indicates internal government correspondence, likely involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), concerning files related to the Epstein case in the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The sender and recipients are heavily redacted.
This document contains email metadata from February 18, 2021, with the subject 'RE: Question re SDFL Epstein file'. The correspondence involves entities abbreviated as 'USANYS' (likely a US Attorney's Office in NY) and 'SDFL' (Southern District of Florida). The identities of the sender and primary recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2020, involving USANYS officials discussing a budget shortfall ('out of money through the end of the fiscal'). The staff is seeking approval for approximately $10,000 to hire a vendor immediately to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff,' rather than waiting until the new fiscal year in October. One email notes that while money is tight, 'Maxwell is on his radar' (referring to a superior), suggesting exceptions might be made for high-priority cases.
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from September 10, 2020, between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/FBI). The discussion concerns a budget shortage ('out of money through the end of the fiscal') preventing the immediate hiring of a vendor to scan 'SDFL Epstein stuff' and process 'OPR Epstein stuff'. Despite the shortage, one participant confirms that an unidentified male superior 'will find the 10K for Maxwell' to ensure the work proceeds without waiting until October.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity