DOJ-OGR-00004709.jpg
459 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
459 KB
Summary
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 295) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines the arguments to be made in the filing, which address several motions from the defendant, including arguments related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, double jeopardy, pre-trial delay, and the disclosure of statements from 'Minor Victim-4'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the heading 'Jeffrey Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar the Superseding Indictment'.
|
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Mentioned in the headings for sections IV and V regarding motions to dismiss.
|
| Minor Victim-4 | Victim |
Mentioned in the heading 'Minor Victim-4’s Prior Statements Constitute Giglio and Jencks Act Material, Which Do Not W...
|
| Giglio |
Referenced in 'Giglio and Jencks Act Material', likely referring to the legal precedent Giglio v. United States.
|
|
| Jencks |
Referenced in 'Giglio and Jencks Act Material', likely referring to the Jencks Act.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DOJ-OGR | Government Agency |
Appears as a document identifier in the footer: DOJ-OGR-00004709.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
The document outlines a legal argument concerning 'Minor Victim-4’s Prior Statements' in the context of 'The Defendant’s Motion[s]'.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,716 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 295 Filed 05/25/21 Page 2 of 26
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1
ARGUMENT................................................................................................................................ 2
I. Jeffrey Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement Does Not Bar the Superseding
Indictment........................................................................................................................... 2
Indictment........................................................................................................................... 2
II. Counts Five and Six Are Not Barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause ................................. 7
III. Counts Five and Six Are Timely ......................................................................................... 11
IV. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the S2 Indictment Based on Alleged Improper
PreTrial Delay Should Be Denied..................................................................................... 13
PreTrial Delay Should Be Denied..................................................................................... 13
V. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count Five and Either Count One or Count Three
as Multiplicitous Is Premature........................................................................................... 16
as Multiplicitous Is Premature........................................................................................... 16
VI. A Bill of Particulars Is Not Warranted ............................................................................... 17
VII. Minor Victim-4’s Prior Statements Constitute Giglio and Jencks Act Material, Which
Do Not Warrant Immediate Disclosure ............................................................................ 20
Do Not Warrant Immediate Disclosure ............................................................................ 20
CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 22
i
DOJ-OGR-00004709
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document