Event Details

This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a defendant's motion to dismiss Counts Five and Six of an indictment. The document asserts that the charges, which involve the sexual abuse of a minor, are timely filed under the statute of limitations (18 U.S.C. § 3283) because the victim is still alive. It also states that the court has previously rejected the defendant's legal arguments regarding the applicability of the statute and its retroactivity.

This legal document, a page from a court filing, argues that the defendant was never subjected to double jeopardy in the Southern District of Florida. It asserts that jeopardy never attached because she was never indicted, convicted, or faced adjudication of facts for the offenses in question. The document cites several legal precedents to support the claim that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving the defendant and Epstein did not trigger jeopardy protections as no indictment was ever filed.

This legal document, filed on May 25, 2021, argues that Counts Five and Six of a criminal case are timely and a motion to dismiss them should be denied. The argument rests on 18 U.S.C. § 3299, a 2006 law that eliminated the statute of limitations for certain sex crimes, which is being applied retroactively to conduct from 2001-2004 based on the legal precedent set in Landgraf v. USI Film Products.

This legal document, filed on May 25, 2021, is a legal argument concerning the scope of plea agreements across different federal judicial districts. The author argues, based on Second Circuit precedent like Annabi, that a plea agreement from one district does not bind another unless explicitly stated. The document contrasts this with a broader interpretation from the Third Circuit (in United States v. Gebbie), which the defendant in the current case (Maxwell) is urging the court to adopt.

This document is the table of contents for a legal filing (Document 295) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on May 25, 2021. It outlines the arguments to be made in the filing, which address several motions from the defendant, including arguments related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, double jeopardy, pre-trial delay, and the disclosure of statements from 'Minor Victim-4'.