HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301.jpg

1.71 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Political analysis document, possibly from a house oversight committee collection based on the footer.
File Size: 1.71 MB
Summary

This document is a political analysis discussing the potential for a third-party U.S. presidential candidate, proposing a 'fix-it' ticket with a one-term pledge. It references Michael Bloomberg's decision not to run in 2016 and analyzes a hypothetical 2020 election scenario where the House of Representatives decides the presidency. Contrary to the prompt's premise, this document contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or any related individuals or events.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Michael Bloomberg Potential third-party presidential candidate
Mentioned as having reportedly declined to run on a third-party ticket in 2016 for fear of splitting support from Hil...
Hillary Clinton 2016 Presidential Candidate
Her support was allegedly at risk of being split by a potential Michael Bloomberg third-party run in 2016.
Trump President / Presidential Candidate
Mentioned as the winner of the 2016 election, which a Bloomberg run might have facilitated. Also mentioned as a candi...

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
U.S. Congress
Discussed in the context of passing laws and its procedural brokenness, including the Senate filibuster.
House of Representatives
Mentioned as the body that would choose the president if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes.
Senate
The Senate filibuster is mentioned as a high hurdle for a third-party president.
Democratic Party
One of the two major political parties in the U.S. system.
Republican Party (GOP)
One of the two major political parties in the U.S. system. It is noted that the GOP would likely control the majority...
House Oversight
Inferred from the document footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301', likely indicating the source or collection of the document.

Timeline (2 events)

2016
U.S. Presidential Election. The document notes that reports suggested Michael Bloomberg considered but ultimately declined a third-party run, fearing it would split votes from Hillary Clinton and result in a GOP-controlled House electing Donald Trump.
United States
2020
A hypothetical scenario for the U.S. Presidential Election where no candidate secures 270 electoral votes, forcing the House of Representatives to decide the outcome. The document analyzes that the GOP would likely have the advantage in such a scenario.
United States

Locations (1)

Location Context
The country where the political analysis and events described take place.

Relationships (2)

Michael Bloomberg Political figures in 2016 election cycle Hillary Clinton
Document states Bloomberg considered a run that could have split support from Clinton.
Hillary Clinton Political opponents Trump
They were the major candidates in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

Key Quotes (3)

"This 'fix-it' ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301.jpg
Quote #1
"In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301.jpg
Quote #2
"But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,588 characters)

• This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking time bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, gerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples our candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive action. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and narrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This "fix-it" ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road.
• This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities in Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a "majority of a majority" supports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president could force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The Senate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto disruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both parties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies passed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda items that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course is better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy.
And if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the next president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House would have just elected Trump.
Would Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as president? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress - the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026301

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document