This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between a judge and several attorneys. The main topics are the logistics for a subpoenaed witness who has been placed 'on call' for the trial and a statement from one attorney that the defense is not expected to stipulate on an issue.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Speaker (likely attorney) |
Speaks about an office in Colorado and explains the subpoena arrangements for a witness.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presides over the proceedings, asks questions, and directs the actions in the courtroom.
|
| MS. COMEY | Speaker (likely attorney) |
States her belief that the defense will not stipulate on an issue.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Speaker (likely attorney) |
Offers to get the next witness for the trial.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by Ms. Menninger as the location of an office she contacted.
|
"Your Honor, I believe the defense is not going to stipulate, but I'll let them speak for themselves."Source
"The subpoena return date was for the first day of trial. And for each one of them we communicated to place them on call because we didn't know when we would need them, and we didn't want them to have to wait here, so --"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,211 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document