This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues that a witness is not credible because she had multiple opportunities in the past, including a deposition in 2009, to name Ghislaine Maxwell as an accomplice but failed to do so. The speaker also points to evidence, such as message pads, that will be given to the jury and allegedly show no incriminating messages for Maxwell.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
Mentioned in the header as the person giving the summation.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Subject of testimony |
Repeatedly mentioned as someone an unnamed witness failed to implicate in prior statements and depositions.
|
| Epstein | Associate of Maxwell |
Mentioned in relation to the "Epstein home" and as the person Carolyn was calling for.
|
| Carolyn | Caller |
Mentioned as the author of a message for Ghislaine Maxwell, where she was "calling for Epstein."
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity that "grabbed all of those message pads" as evidence.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location of the "operation" the witness was asked about.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the place where the jury will receive the message pads as evidence.
|
"Yes, they are."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,653 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document