Epstein home
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00038382.pdf
This document is an extortion email sent to an individual named Edward on November 21, 2019. The sender claims to be a former staff member at 'the Zorro' (Epstein's ranch) and purports to possess incriminating video footage of Jeffrey Epstein involving minors and 'Madam G'. The sender demands a payment of 1 Bitcoin in exchange for the material, threatening that this is a one-time offer.
DOJ-OGR-00018929.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Hesse identifies Government Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 as message pads used to take phone messages while they were working at the 'Epstein home'. The witness confirms their familiarity with the message pads, their contents, and affirms that their signature is present in all three books.
DOJ-OGR-00018926.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. A witness, identified as Hesse, testifies about being employed around 2003 at the Palm Beach residence of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The witness states they were hired directly by Ghislaine Maxwell to maintain the home when the owners were not present.
DOJ-OGR-00018637.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. Meder testifies about preparing a location report for the government concerning evidence, specifically CDs, found at Mr. Epstein's home. The witness confirms they were personally present during two searches of the property and compared the evidence item numbers to their locations within the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018586.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between an attorney, Ms. Menninger, and the judge. Ms. Menninger objects to the admission of photographs found in Mr. Epstein's home, arguing they could be altered, lack proper foundation, and are cumulative. The Court repeatedly overrules her objections, stating that the fact they were found in Epstein's home is sufficient for them to be considered.
DOJ-OGR-00017150.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. Menninger argues that a witness is not credible because she had multiple opportunities in the past, including a deposition in 2009, to name Ghislaine Maxwell as an accomplice but failed to do so. The speaker also points to evidence, such as message pads, that will be given to the jury and allegedly show no incriminating messages for Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013342.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, containing the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. The witness testifies about their employment in approximately 2003 at the Palm Beach residence of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Hesse states they were hired by Maxwell to perform maintenance and care for the home when the owners were absent.
DOJ-OGR-00032307.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated February 17, 2006, documents investigative activities from July to September 2005 for case 1-05-000368. The report details receiving subpoena results from phone companies, conducting surveillance on a residence associated with Nada Marcinkova, and checking Jeffrey Epstein's residence and local airport for his presence. A second narrative entry describes a meeting where it was learned that the department's Burglary Strike Force was actively conducting surveillance on both Epstein and another individual named Robson.
DOJ-OGR-00014529.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in sworn testimony or depositions 12 years prior (2009), nor did message pads show calls to Maxwell from Carolyn, only to Epstein. The defense uses this inconsistency to attack the credibility of the witness's current testimony connecting Maxwell to the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017597.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving a legal dispute over the admissibility of impeachment evidence. Ms. Menninger (Defense) argues that she was not required to produce impeachment photographs to the government prior to trial, while Ms. Comey (Government) requests to brief the issue. The discussion specifically references photographs of the 'Epstein home' taken recently (2021/last year) being used to discuss past events.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity