DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg

530 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 530 KB
Summary

This page contains a cross-examination transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on January 15, 2025. A witness named Rocchio is being questioned regarding the definition and implications of 'vulnerable populations,' specifically regarding risks of sexual abuse, physical assault, substance abuse, and school drop-out rates. Rocchio pushes back against the attorney's broad generalization of risk, emphasizing specific research contexts regarding sexual victimization.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Subject of cross-examination (indicated in header 'Rocchio - Cross'). Providing expert opinion on vulnerable populati...
Unidentified Attorney (Q) Interviewer
Conducting the cross-examination.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2025-01-15
Filing date of the court document.
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Maxwell Case) and Southern District Reporters

Relationships (1)

Unidentified Attorney (Q) Legal Adversary/Cross-Examiner Rocchio
Q and A format of the transcript labeled 'Rocchio - Cross'

Key Quotes (3)

"Vulnerability implies higher risk, yes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg
Quote #1
"But the research has differentially looked at risk for, for example, sexual victimization versus other kinds of victimization."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg
Quote #2
"No. Because you're using the term more generally than what I was trying to say in my opinion."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014988.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,245 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 112 of 158 112
LBAGmax4 Rocchio - Cross
1 in the literature to be at higher risk for sexual abuse.
2 Q. And vulnerable populations are at higher risk for many
3 things; correct?
4 A. Depending on what you're talking about, sure.
5 Q. Well, vulnerable population?
6 A. Vulnerability implies higher risk, yes.
7 Q. Vulnerable populations could be at higher risk for being
8 physically assaulted; correct?
9 A. Yes. But the research has differentially looked at risk
10 for, for example, sexual victimization versus other kinds of
11 victimization.
12 Q. Vulnerable populations can be at higher risk for dropping
13 out of school; right?
14 A. Certain ones, sure.
15 Q. Vulnerable populations can be at higher risk for substance
16 abuse?
17 A. Sure, yes.
18 Q. Vulnerable populations can be at higher risk for health
19 issues; right?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So being in a vulnerable population means basically that
22 you're at a higher risk for something bad happening to you in
23 the future; correct?
24 A. No. Because you're using the term more generally than what
25 I was trying to say in my opinion. So I'm looking at the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014988

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document