EFTA00027959.pdf
117 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
117 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at USANYS reached out to the Associate Deputy Attorney General to discuss document and discovery requests related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), specifically in light of the recent charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The ODAG official advised contacting SDFL directly as CVRA litigation had concluded and noted that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) had conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| [REDACTED] | Chief, Public Corruption Unit |
Sender from USANYS (SDNY); initiating contact regarding Epstein/Maxwell documents.
|
| [REDACTED] | Associate Deputy Attorney General |
Recipient/Sender from ODAG; discusses recusal issues and directs inquiries to SDFL.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as recently charged, prompting the revisiting of document requests.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Subject |
Mentioned regarding his death mooting previous conversations and the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (3)
Relationships (2)
USANYS (SDNY)
→
Professional/Legal
→
ODAG
Coordinating via email regarding discovery in the Maxwell case.
Mentioned together in subject line and context of charges.
Key Quotes (5)
"We've recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell and, anticipating potentially similar issues, we were hoping to revisit those conversations."Source
EFTA00027959.pdf
Quote #1
"Those conversations were largely at mooted at the time by Epstein's death"Source
EFTA00027959.pdf
Quote #2
"Now that the CVRA litigation is over, you probably are best going directly to SDFL, as I don't have any of their documents."Source
EFTA00027959.pdf
Quote #3
"I also know OPR did a significant document collection last year."Source
EFTA00027959.pdf
Quote #4
"Among our questions was who, whether at ODAG, SDFL, or NDGA we should be in touch with at this point regarding documents."Source
EFTA00027959.pdf
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,787 characters)
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG)" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:04:56 +0000
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG)" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:04:56 +0000
Great. Since [REDACTED] and I are in different locations, I can circulate a dial in.
From: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 2:33 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 2:33 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thursday at noon is perfect. Should I give you a call?
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:39 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:39 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thanks, [REDACTED]. Would 12pm tomorrow (Thursday) work for you? If not, we also have availability Friday morning, from 10-12:30 if anything in there works for you. Best, [REDACTED].
From: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:03 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:03 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Hi [REDACTED],
I'm happy to assist you. I'm available Thursday or Friday to discuss what documents you are trying to locate. Please let me know if you have availability on either of those days.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thanks. OPR and [REDACTED] may have a better sense on document custodians than do I. [REDACTED].
EFTA00027959
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:41 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:41 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Thanks, [REDACTED]. Among our questions was who, whether at ODAG, SDFL, or NDGA we should be in touch with at this point regarding documents. I also know OPR did a significant document collection last year.
We will reach back to OPR, but if there is a particular point of contact at SDFL or NDGA on issues related to document collection, in particular, please let us know. And if a call on those issues would be helpful, happy to set one up.
Thanks very much,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 10:56 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: RE: Epstein/Maxwell
Happy to talk, but my only real role related to recusal issues and consequences. Now that the CVRA litigation is over, you probably are best going directly to SDFL, as I don't have any of their documents. Thanks, [REDACTED].
[REDACTED]
Associate Deputy Attorney General
Office: [REDACTED]
Cell: [REDACTED]
Associate Deputy Attorney General
Office: [REDACTED]
Cell: [REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:23 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Epstein/Maxwell
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:23 PM
To: [REDACTED] (ODAG) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Epstein/Maxwell
[REDACTED] — Hope all is well. We had spoken last summer, after the Epstein case was charged, about some potential document/discovery requests related to the SDFL investigation and the NPA, in particular. Those conversations were largely at mooted at the time by Epstein's death, but as I'm sure you know, we've recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell and, anticipating potentially similar issues, we were hoping to revisit those conversations. Do you have time later this week for a quick call? If so, please let us know what might work for you.
Thanks very much,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
EFTA00027960
Tel. [REDACTED]
EFTA00027961
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document