This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, from Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the defendant poses a flight risk and has failed to meet the burden of production to rebut the presumption of detention, citing recommendations from Pretrial Services and victims' requests. The Judge questions Ms. Moe regarding defense attorney Mr. Cohen's arguments about the government's burden of proof regarding flight risk.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Arguing on behalf of the government for the continued detention of the defendant.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning the prosecutor about legal standards and burdens of proof.
|
| Mr. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Referenced by the Court as having argued that the government failed to address statutory standards regarding flight r...
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the detention hearing (Ghislaine Maxwell, implied by case number 21-770 and filename code 'MaxC').
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Pretrial Services |
Recommended that the defendant be detained.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service responsible for the transcript.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team arguing for detention.
|
"defendant has not met her burden to rebut the presumption of detention in this case."Source
"the government has serious concerns that the defendant will flee if afforded the opportunity."Source
"It is important, your Honor, that there be a trial in this case"Source
"It is the defendant's burden of production to rebut the presumption that there are no set of conditions that could reasonably assure her continued appearance in this case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,714 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document