DOJ-OGR-00016779.jpg
593 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
593 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing the defense's attempt to impeach an investigation. It references testimony from witnesses Stephen Flatley, who extracted files from devices, and Kimberly Meder, who reviewed photographs. The Court refers to a prior November 1st ruling that precludes certain investigative steps as direct evidence.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Speaker/Counsel |
Participating in court proceedings.
|
| MS. COMEY | Speaker/Counsel |
Participating in court proceedings, mentioning witnesses.
|
| Stephen Flatley | Witness |
Extracted files from devices, was on the stand.
|
| Kimberly Meder | Witness |
Reviewed photographs, was on the stand.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, making a ruling.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Responsible for recording the court proceedings.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding where the defense intends to impeach an investigation. Discussion includes witness testimony regarding extraction of files from devices and review of photographs. The Court refers to a previous ruling from November 1st.
Courtroom
Relationships (4)
MS. COMEY: ...we put on the witness who extracted all of the files from all of these devices. That's Stephen Flatley.
And we put on a witness who reviewed all the photographs. That was Kimberly Meder.
MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you.
Key Quotes (3)
"What the defense wants to do now is impeach the investigation, that is what this is about."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016779.jpg
Quote #1
"Consistent with my ruling, to the extent they put the thoroughness of the investigation -- I wouldn't say it was thoroughness, but they put the relevant agent who you could have crossed on this on the stand."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016779.jpg
Quote #2
"I might not have permitted it there, but I certainly won't permit it further removed as direct evidence of the thoroughness of the government's investigation and investigative steps, which is precluded by my November 1st ruling."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016779.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,460 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 50 of 197
LCHVMAX2
2591
1
MR. EVERDELL: She didn't. But she reviewed, I
2
3
believe, every file that was extracted from the devices; so she
knows generally how many there were and what types there were.
4
MS. COMEY: Your Honor, we put on the witness who
5
extracted all of the files from all of these devices. That's
6
Stephen Flatley. He was on the stand.
And we put on a witness
7
who reviewed all the photographs.
That was Kimberly Meder.
8
She was on the stand.
9
What the defense wants to do now is impeach the
10
investigation, that is what this is about.
11
THE COURT: Okay.
12
13
government.
Consistent with my ruling, to the extent they put
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
You had the opportunity to ask witnesses put on by the
the thoroughness of the investigation
thoroughness, but they put the relevant agent who you could
have crossed on this on the stand. And maybe there would have
been an objection, to the extent you were calling into question
the thoroughness of the investigation without it being raised.
I might not have permitted it there, but I certainly won't
permit it further removed as direct evidence of the
thoroughness of the government's investigation and
investigative steps, which is precluded by my November 1st
I wouldn't say it was
23
ruling.
24
25
MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
THE COURT: Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016779
LCHVMAX2
2591
1
MR. EVERDELL: She didn't. But she reviewed, I
2
3
believe, every file that was extracted from the devices; so she
knows generally how many there were and what types there were.
4
MS. COMEY: Your Honor, we put on the witness who
5
extracted all of the files from all of these devices. That's
6
Stephen Flatley. He was on the stand.
And we put on a witness
7
who reviewed all the photographs.
That was Kimberly Meder.
8
She was on the stand.
9
What the defense wants to do now is impeach the
10
investigation, that is what this is about.
11
THE COURT: Okay.
12
13
government.
Consistent with my ruling, to the extent they put
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
You had the opportunity to ask witnesses put on by the
the thoroughness of the investigation
thoroughness, but they put the relevant agent who you could
have crossed on this on the stand. And maybe there would have
been an objection, to the extent you were calling into question
the thoroughness of the investigation without it being raised.
I might not have permitted it there, but I certainly won't
permit it further removed as direct evidence of the
thoroughness of the government's investigation and
investigative steps, which is precluded by my November 1st
I wouldn't say it was
23
ruling.
24
25
MR. EVERDELL: Understood, your Honor.
THE COURT: Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016779
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document