STEPHEN FLATLEY
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Witness prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
US
|
Witness prosecution |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Kelso
|
Opposing experts |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Witness presented by counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal examination | Redirect examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Direct examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Recross-examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Menninger. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal examination | Cross-examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Menninger. | Southern District | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court proceeding where the defense intends to impeach an investigation. Discussion includes witne... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | The government calls witness Stephen Flatley, who is sworn in and begins his direct examination b... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
EFTA00016268.pdf
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018231.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between several attorneys (Ms. Menninger, Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and the judge. The discussion centers on the afternoon's witness schedule, including Kimberly Meder and Stephen Flatley, and a request by Ms. Menninger to address issues with evidentiary material that was disclosed very late the previous night. The judge and attorneys work to clarify the order of proceedings for the remainder of the session.
DOJ-OGR-00020726.jpg
This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), generated on February 28, 2023. It lists entries 700 through 711, all entered on July 12, 2022, which document various letters and motions exchanged between the prosecution (USA) and defense counsel (Menninger, Pagliuca, Everdell) and Judge Alison J. Nathan during late 2021. Key topics include an arrest warrant for Kelly Bovino, testimony of Stephen Flatley, motions to preclude defense witnesses, and issues regarding video monitors and prior inconsistent statements.
DOJ-OGR-00018861.jpg
This document is an index of examinations from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines the direct, cross, redirect, and recross examinations of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by various attorneys. The index also lists several government exhibits that were received during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00018645.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, covering the beginning of testimony from a government witness, Stephen Flatley. After being sworn in, Flatley is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz and establishes his identity and his employment with the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team in the New York division.
DOJ-OGR-00017156.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript containing the closing argument (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues that metadata presented by forensic expert Stephen Flatley does not prove Maxwell wrote specific incriminating documents, as flight logs show she was not in the location ('the house') where the desktop computer was located when those documents were created. The defense suggests multiple people had access to the computer.
DOJ-OGR-00016779.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, discussing the defense's attempt to impeach an investigation. It references testimony from witnesses Stephen Flatley, who extracted files from devices, and Kimberly Meder, who reviewed photographs. The Court refers to a prior November 1st ruling that precludes certain investigative steps as direct evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00013276.jpg
This document is an index page (Page 263 of 264) from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists the examination of witnesses Kimberly Meder, Stephen Flatley, and Carolyn by attorneys Comey, Menninger, Pomerantz, and Pagliuca. It also tracks the receipt of Government Exhibits 304, 306, 307, 320, 321, 322, and 324 into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00013060.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (Document 753, filed 08/10/22) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the swearing-in and initial direct examination of government witness Stephen Flatley. Flatley identifies himself as an employee of the FBI, specifically working in the New York division's Computer Analysis Response Team.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity