DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
637 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (appellate)
File Size:
637 KB
Summary
A page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated October 8, 2020, arguing against the immediate unsealing of Ghislaine Maxwell's April 2016 deposition. The text asserts that Judge Preska's unsealing order must be reviewed immediately because a post-trial appeal would be too late to prevent public release, which cannot be undone ('re-sealed').
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
Presiding judge whose order to unseal deposition material is being contested.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; requesting the court review issues regarding the unsealing of her deposition.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court of Appeals (implied) |
Referred to as 'this Court' and mentioned as having a 'panel' reviewing the order.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Information Services (indicated in Bates stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Maxwell is challenging Preska's unsealing order.
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge Preska needs that information now, not later, because her order unsealing the deposition material is about to go into effect"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell simply asks this Court to review these issues now, before it’s too late."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell’s April 2016 deposition will be publicly released."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
Quote #3
"By that time, there won’t be a way to “re-seal” material prematurely released"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019653.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,483 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page7 of 23
[REDACTED] and how it obtained it (by circumventing
this Court’s decision in Martindell).
this Court’s decision in Martindell).
Judge Preska needs that information now, not later, because her order
unsealing the deposition material is about to go into effect and because she is poised
to decide whether and to what extent to keep unsealing the sealed material in the
civil case [REDACTED]. The panel of this Court reviewing
Judge Preska’s order needs that information now, not later, because it is poised to
review Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material without the benefit
of knowing all the relevant information. And unless this Court is privy to the
relevant information, it won’t be able to decide whether Judge Preska should
reconsider her order given [REDACTED]. Ms.
Maxwell simply asks this Court to review these issues now, before it’s too late.
unsealing the deposition material is about to go into effect and because she is poised
to decide whether and to what extent to keep unsealing the sealed material in the
civil case [REDACTED]. The panel of this Court reviewing
Judge Preska’s order needs that information now, not later, because it is poised to
review Judge Preska’s order unsealing the deposition material without the benefit
of knowing all the relevant information. And unless this Court is privy to the
relevant information, it won’t be able to decide whether Judge Preska should
reconsider her order given [REDACTED]. Ms.
Maxwell simply asks this Court to review these issues now, before it’s too late.
A post-trial appeal will be too late. By that time, if this Court affirms Judge
Preska’s unsealing order without the benefit of knowing all the facts, Ms.
Maxwell’s April 2016 deposition will be publicly released. By that time, Judge
Preska will have largely if not entirely decided what other material from the civil
case should be unsealed. By that time, it will be too late for Ms. Maxwell to seek a
stay of the unsealing process and fairly explain why a stay is appropriate. And by
that time, there won’t be a way to “re-seal” material prematurely released to the
Preska’s unsealing order without the benefit of knowing all the facts, Ms.
Maxwell’s April 2016 deposition will be publicly released. By that time, Judge
Preska will have largely if not entirely decided what other material from the civil
case should be unsealed. By that time, it will be too late for Ms. Maxwell to seek a
stay of the unsealing process and fairly explain why a stay is appropriate. And by
that time, there won’t be a way to “re-seal” material prematurely released to the
4
DOJ-OGR-00019653
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document