DOJ-OGR-00000027.jpg
377 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Appellate court decision (summary of holdings)
File Size:
377 KB
Summary
This document is the final page (page 26) of an appellate court decision dated September 17, 2024, affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court lists five key holdings, rejecting Maxwell's arguments regarding Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, the statute of limitations, a motion for a new trial, jury instructions, and sentencing reasonableness. The document concludes by explicitly affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the prosecution, indictment, and conviction being affirmed.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Co-conspirator |
Mentioned regarding his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and whether it protected Maxwell.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO-SDFL |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (entered into NPA with Epstein).
|
|
| USAO-SDNY |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (prosecuted Maxwell).
|
|
| District Court |
The court whose judgment and sentencing are being affirmed.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR footer).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-06-29
Judgment of conviction entered by the District Court.
District Court
2024-09-17
Appellate Court affirms the District Court's judgment.
Appellate Court
Appellate Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
Unknown
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the USAO-SDFL.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the USAO-SDNY.
|
Relationships (2)
Maxwell attempted to use Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) as a bar to her own prosecution.
Prosecution by USAO-SDNY upheld against Maxwell.
Key Quotes (2)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (751 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 109-1, 09/17/2024, 3634097, Page26 of 26
1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein’s NPA with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell’s prosecution by USAO-SDNY.
2. The District Court did not err in holding that the Indictment was filed within the statute of limitations.
3. The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell’s Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
4. The District Court’s response to a jury note did not result in a constructive amendment of, or prejudicial variance from, the allegations in the Indictment.
5. The District Court’s sentence was procedurally reasonable.
For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the District Court’s June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction.
26
DOJ-OGR-00000027
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document