DOJ-OGR-00017961.jpg

522 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 522 KB
Summary

This document is a page from the court transcript for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio, where the defense asks about the impact of traumatic brain injury, alcohol, and controlled substances on memory recall and the concept of 'confabulation.' Ms. Pomerantz (prosecution) successfully objects to several questions regarding memory and abuse disclosure, but an objection regarding the definition of confabulation is overruled.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Dr. Rocchio Witness / Expert
Under cross-examination regarding memory, trauma, and confabulation.
Ms. Pomerantz Attorney (Prosecution)
Making objections to the defense's line of questioning.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections (Sustaining most, overruling one).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
US District Court
Implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (SDNY).
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Southern District of New York Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number and reporter location.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Pomerantz Legal Protection Dr. Rocchio
Pomerantz repeatedly objects to questions posed to Rocchio to prevent him from having to answer broad hypotheticals.

Key Quotes (3)

"Q. For example if somebody has a traumatic brain injury, it may be difficult for someone as a matter of physiology to retrieve a memory?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017961.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. Are you familiar with the concept of confabulation, Dr. Rocchio?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017961.jpg
Quote #2
"Q. If someone is consuming alcohol or controlled substances, they may not have a very good recall of a particular event, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017961.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,241 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 88 of 228 764
LC2Qmax3 Rocchio - Cross
1 A. Could you clarify? I'm not really sure what you're asking.
2 Q. Sure. For example if somebody has a traumatic brain
3 injury, it may be difficult for someone as a matter of
4 physiology to retrieve a memory?
5 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Sustained.
7 Q. There are other factors that relate to the ability of
8 someone to accurately disclose a piece of information about any
9 alleged abuse, correct?
10 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Sustained.
12 Q. Would you agree with me, Dr. Rocchio, that, for example,
13 alcohol consumption can impact the disclosure of an event?
14 A. I guess it would depend on the context. That question is
15 so broad, I'm not really sure how to answer it.
16 Q. If someone is consuming alcohol or controlled substances,
17 they may not have a very good recall of a particular event,
18 correct?
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Sustained.
21 Q. Are you familiar with the concept of confabulation,
22 Dr. Rocchio?
23 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
24 THE COURT: Overruled.
25 A. I am.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017961

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document