DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
644 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
644 KB
Summary
This is page 9 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on December 16, 2019. The Judge is addressing counsel regarding the release conditions for a defendant named Ms. Noel. The Judge clarifies that while the defense and government have reached an agreement, the Court has final authority, and discusses a specific pretrial service policy regarding firearms, noting that the case involves allegations about documents, not violence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, explaining the court's authority regarding release conditions.
|
| Ms. Noel | Defendant/Client |
Subject of the release hearing; judge notes there are no specific safety concerns about her and that she is not accus...
|
| Defense Counsel | Attorney |
Implied recipient of the Judge's address ('your client').
|
| Government | Prosecution |
Mentioned as having reached an agreement with the defense.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney's Office |
Mentioned regarding firearm policies.
|
|
| Pretrial Service Office |
Agency responsible for the firearm policy and enforcing release terms.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on court reporter name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (2)
Judge refers to Ms. Noel as 'your client' when addressing the attorney.
Judge notes the parties 'reached agreement on certain terms' and are 'working well together'.
Key Quotes (4)
"in this kind of case, which is an allegation about documents."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
Quote #1
"that agreement is meaningful to me but it's certainly not controlling."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
Quote #2
"It's not a policy of the U.S. Attorney's Office; it's a policy of our pretrial service office"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
Quote #3
"this case is not a violent case and there are not allegations that your client has engaged in violence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,670 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 14 Filed 12/16/19 Page 9 of 12 9
JBJKNOEN
JBJKNOEN
1 in this kind of case, which is an allegation about documents.
2 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
3 I have a few responses. The first is, although I
4 greatly appreciate when the parties are able to reach agreement
5 on the terms of a defendant's release, that agreement is
6 meaningful to me but it's certainly not controlling. I
7 ultimately decide how defendants should be released. And there
8 have been occasions where I've disagreed with an agreement
9 between the parties. So the fact that you and the government
10 reached agreement on certain terms, the terms that will be
11 imposed may be different than that agreement. It's simply, the
12 way that court proceeds. And the fact of the agreement -- while
13 very helpful and I appreciate it, and it suggests that the
14 parties are working well together -- doesn't necessarily mean
15 that those are the conditions that I'm going to impose.
16 The second thing to say with respect to the issue of
17 firearms is that it is in fact a policy. It's not a policy of
18 the U.S. Attorney's Office; it's a policy of our pretrial
19 service office, because they are going to be sending officers
20 in to enforce the terms of your client's release, and, as you
21 said yourself, the world is crazy, and they have safety
22 concerns, which isn't to say that they have specific safety
23 concerns about Ms. Noel. And, as you point out, this case is
24 not a violent case and there are not allegations that your
25 client has engaged in violence, either in connection with this
2 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
3 I have a few responses. The first is, although I
4 greatly appreciate when the parties are able to reach agreement
5 on the terms of a defendant's release, that agreement is
6 meaningful to me but it's certainly not controlling. I
7 ultimately decide how defendants should be released. And there
8 have been occasions where I've disagreed with an agreement
9 between the parties. So the fact that you and the government
10 reached agreement on certain terms, the terms that will be
11 imposed may be different than that agreement. It's simply, the
12 way that court proceeds. And the fact of the agreement -- while
13 very helpful and I appreciate it, and it suggests that the
14 parties are working well together -- doesn't necessarily mean
15 that those are the conditions that I'm going to impose.
16 The second thing to say with respect to the issue of
17 firearms is that it is in fact a policy. It's not a policy of
18 the U.S. Attorney's Office; it's a policy of our pretrial
19 service office, because they are going to be sending officers
20 in to enforce the terms of your client's release, and, as you
21 said yourself, the world is crazy, and they have safety
22 concerns, which isn't to say that they have specific safety
23 concerns about Ms. Noel. And, as you point out, this case is
24 not a violent case and there are not allegations that your
25 client has engaged in violence, either in connection with this
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021967
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document