DOJ-OGR-00002276(1).jpg
463 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
463 KB
Summary
This is page 2 of a legal letter filed on January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (Ghislaine Maxwell case). Attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP inform Judge Alison J. Nathan that they will submit motions containing 'Confidential Information' via email for review rather than filing them immediately on the public docket, to allow the government to review proposed redactions pursuant to a Protective Order.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
The Honorable, recipient of the letter
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Attorney |
Sender, signatory, representing the defense
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Attorney |
Signatory, listed under Mark S. Cohen
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Firm representing the signatories
|
|
| The Court |
Recipient of the motions and email submissions
|
|
| The Government |
Party reviewing proposed redactions
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (1 events)
January 25, 2021
Filing of Document 118 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
New York (SDNY implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Relationships (2)
Both listed as attorneys for Cohen & Gresser LLP on the signature block.
Cohen is submitting a formal letter to Judge Nathan regarding case procedures.
Key Quotes (3)
"Several of the motions reference or discuss Confidential Information produced in discovery and are therefore redacted pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Protective Order (Dkt. 36)."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002276(1).jpg
Quote #1
"In an abundance of caution, and to give the government the chance to review the proposed redactions, we will not file on the public docket any motions containing redactions until we are instructed to do so by the Court."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002276(1).jpg
Quote #2
"Instead, we will submit by email to the Court and the government two versions of those motions—an unredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed redactions"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002276(1).jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,176 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 118 Filed 01/25/21 Page 2 of 2
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
January 25, 2021
Page 2
January 25, 2021
Page 2
Several of the motions reference or discuss Confidential Information produced in discovery and are therefore redacted pursuant to paragraph 15 of the Protective Order (Dkt. 36). In an abundance of caution, and to give the government the chance to review the proposed redactions, we will not file on the public docket any motions containing redactions until we are instructed to do so by the Court. Instead, we will submit by email to the Court and the government two versions of those motions—an unredacted original to be kept under seal and a version for public filing with proposed redactions—pursuant to Rule 2(B) of the Court’s individual rules of criminal practice. We will file on the public docket any motions that do not contain redactions.
Please contact us with any questions. Your consideration is greatly appreciated.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Mark S. Cohen
Mark S. Cohen
Christian R. Everdell
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10022
(212) 957-7600
Mark S. Cohen
Christian R. Everdell
COHEN & GRESSER LLP
800 Third Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10022
(212) 957-7600
cc: All counsel of record (via email)
DOJ-OGR-00002276
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document