DOJ-OGR-00008601.jpg
352 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / jury instructions
File Size:
352 KB
Summary
This document is page 63 (internal page 62) of a court filing dated December 18, 2021, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains specific jury instructions regarding the burden of proof and 'guilt by association,' explicitly instructing the jury that they cannot convict Maxwell solely based on her association with other criminals or her knowledge of their wrongdoing.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the jury instructions regarding guilt determination and association with wrongdoers.
|
| The Judge | Presiding Official |
The speaker ('I') giving instructions to the jury.
|
| The Jury | Fact Finders |
The recipients ('you') of the instructions regarding evidence and conviction.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00008601.
|
|
| US District Court |
Implied by the case number format 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-12-18
Filing of Document 563 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Court
Ms. Maxwell
Court
Relationships (1)
Text mentions 'associated with other people who were guilty of wrongdoing'.
Key Quotes (3)
"you may not infer that Ms. Maxwell is guilty of participating in criminal conduct merely from the fact that she associated with other people who were guilty of wrongdoing"Source
DOJ-OGR-00008601.jpg
Quote #1
"merely because she has or had knowledge of the wrongdoing of others."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008601.jpg
Quote #2
"you must be satisfied of the guilt of Ms. Maxwell as to each count charged before you may convict her as to that count."Source
DOJ-OGR-00008601.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (773 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 63 of 167
1 Nor may you use evidence that I have instructed you was admitted for a limited purpose
2 for any inference beyond that limited purpose.
3 In addition, you may not infer that Ms. Maxwell is guilty of participating in criminal
4 conduct merely from the fact that she associated with other people who were guilty of
5 wrongdoing or merely because she has or had knowledge of the wrongdoing of others.
6 Here again, let me remind you that, whether based upon direct or circumstantial evidence,
7 or upon the logical, reasonable inferences drawn from such evidence, you must be satisfied of
8 the guilt of Ms. Maxwell as to each count charged before you may convict her as to that count.
2 for any inference beyond that limited purpose.
3 In addition, you may not infer that Ms. Maxwell is guilty of participating in criminal
4 conduct merely from the fact that she associated with other people who were guilty of
5 wrongdoing or merely because she has or had knowledge of the wrongdoing of others.
6 Here again, let me remind you that, whether based upon direct or circumstantial evidence,
7 or upon the logical, reasonable inferences drawn from such evidence, you must be satisfied of
8 the guilt of Ms. Maxwell as to each count charged before you may convict her as to that count.
62
DOJ-OGR-00008601
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document