This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory. The witness advises using neutral questions to avoid contaminating a witness's memory and notes that stress is usually relevant to the time of the event itself rather than the interview environment.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness |
Expert witness testifying on direct examination regarding memory, interviewing techniques, and contamination.
|
| Unidentified Attorney (Q) | Interrogator |
Attorney conducting the direct examination of Loftus.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CIA |
Mentioned by the witness in the context of lectures or consulting regarding interviewing techniques.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
The court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp prefix 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the court reporter's name (likely SDNY given the case number context).
|
"CIA, I would be talking about interviewing techniques and other sources of potential post-event information that can contaminate memory."Source
"Well, it's certainly open-ended questions give you, in some sense, more accurate information."Source
"you would like to have them be as neutral as possible so that you don't contaminate the witness."Source
"when you ask leading questions like how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other, that's probably not a good way to follow up an open-ended question."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,749 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document