This document is a legal notice filed on May 20, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, involving multiple consolidated cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Plaintiff C.M.A. formally withdraws her objections to Epstein's motion to identify her by her legal name in the case style and in third-party subpoenas, rendering the motion to dismiss moot, though she continues to object to dismissal on alternative grounds. The document lists numerous 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs and provides a service list of attorneys representing both the plaintiffs (Jack Scarola, Jack P. Hill) and the defendant (Richard Willits, Robert Critton, Jack Goldberger, Bruce Reinhart).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in multiple consolidated cases including 08-CV-80119, 08-CV-80232, etc.
|
| C.M.A. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80811; filing notice to withdraw objections to being identified.
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80119
|
| Jane Doe No. 3 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80232
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80380
|
| Jane Doe No. 5 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80381
|
| Jane Doe No. 6 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80994
|
| Jane Doe No. 7 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80993
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 08-CV-80893
|
| Doe II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80469
|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80591
|
| Jane Doe No. 102 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CV-80656
|
| Jack Scarola | Attorney |
Attorney for Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
| Jack P. Hill | Attorney |
Attorney for Plaintiff C.M.A.; signer of the document.
|
| Richard H. Willits | Attorney |
Defense Counsel
|
| Robert Critton | Attorney |
Defense Counsel
|
| Jack A. Goldberger | Attorney |
Defense Counsel
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Attorney |
Defense Counsel
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the cases are filed
|
|
| Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. |
Law firm representing Plaintiff C.M.A.
|
|
| Richard H. Willits, P.A. |
Law firm for defense counsel
|
|
| Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP |
Law firm for defense counsel
|
|
| Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm for defense counsel
|
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm for defense counsel
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of multiple law firms involved
|
|
|
Location of Richard H. Willits, P.A.
|
"Plaintiff withdraws her objection to a) and b) requested above. The request to have C.M.A.'s case dismissed is rendered moot given C.M.A.'s acquiescence to a) and b)."Source
"Counsel for EPSTEIN is free to prepare a proposed agreed order reflecting the above for the Court's consideration following the undersigned's review of same."Source
"That C.M.A. be identified by her legal name in the style of this case"Source
"That Epstein be granted leave to identify C.M.A. by her legal name in Third-Party Subpoenas"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (5,040 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document