WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 04 of 08.pdf
This document contains FBI evidence logs (FD-340), correspondence, and subpoenas related to an investigation (Case ID 31E-MM-108062) regarding child prostitution involving Jeffrey Epstein. It includes subpoena returns from MySpace, Sprint, BellSouth, and Verizon, along with deleted page information sheets indicating numerous withheld documents.
Epstein_Part_03_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains a sworn statement from Juan P. Alessi dated November 21, 2005, detailing his experiences working for Jeffrey Epstein, particularly focusing on Ghislaine Maxwell's role as manager of Epstein's global households and his girlfriend. It also includes a letter from the Town of Palm Beach Police Department Chief Michael S. Reiter to State Attorney Barry E. Krischer dated May 1, 2006, transmitting investigation documents related to Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Haley Robson, and expressing strong concerns about the State Attorney's office's handling of the cases.
Epstein_Part_18.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI and police files related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, ranging from 2005 to 2008. It includes handwritten notes from victim interviews detailing interactions with Epstein involving money, travel, and massages, as well as official subpoenas for telecommunications data and MySpace profile printouts. The file also contains evidence receipts and deleted page information sheets indicating a significant portion of the record is withheld.
Epstein_Part_04.pdf
This document is a release of information from the FBI related to a civil action (17-cv-03956). It contains deleted page information sheets citing exemptions, FD-340 receipts for property from various telecommunication companies (MySpace, Sprint, BellSouth, Verizon) regarding subpoenas, fax cover sheets transmitting subpoena results, and copies of the subpoenas themselves (FD-909) requesting subscriber and toll records for specific phone numbers and user IDs.
Epstein_Records_2.pdf
This document collection consists of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Secondary Inspection Reports and Admissibility Secondary Inspection records for Jeffrey Edward Epstein between 2000 and 2016. The records document dozens of entries into the United States via various ports including West Palm Beach, St. Thomas, Newark, and JFK, utilizing both private aircraft (General Aviation, including tail numbers N908JE and N909JE) and commercial airlines (Air France, Open Skies). The reports confirm his travel history, passport usage, and repeated secondary inspections upon entry, with frequent redactions regarding specific law enforcement remarks.
085.pdf
A 2009 court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County granting Jeffrey Epstein's motion for travel under strict probationary conditions. The order stipulates that travel is restricted to weekdays only (no weekends), limited to one overnight stay per trip, and requires approval 48 hours in advance from probation officer Carmon Sloan.
081.pdf
This document is a Motion for Authorization to Travel filed on December 17, 2009, in Palm Beach County, Florida, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein requests permission to travel to New York for three days to meet with his attorney, Harry Susman, review confidential documents, and interview witnesses related to ongoing litigation. The motion notes that his community control officer, Carmen Sloane, has no objection to the travel provided dates are cleared in advance.
077.pdf
This document is a motion filed on November 25, 2009, in Palm Beach County Circuit Court requesting authorization for Jeffrey Epstein to travel to New York City on two specific dates while under community control. The first request is for December 3, 2009, to review confidential documents with his civil counsel, Stephen Susman, at the law offices of Davis Polk and Wardwell regarding claims against D.B. Zwirn. The second request is for December 12, 2009, for a meeting with an unnamed 'governmental official from a foreign country.' Attached is a letter from Stephen Susman confirming the necessity of the December 3rd meeting.
068.pdf
This document is a Mandate from the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida, dated September 18, 2009, regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The mandate follows an opinion issued on September 2, 2009, where the court affirmed the lower court's decision, treating Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal. The document lists numerous attorneys involved, including R. Alexander Acosta on the distribution list, and identifies Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. as an appellee alongside the State and a redacted party.
066.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Non-Agreement' filed by the State of Florida on September 11, 2009, objecting to a proposed 'Agreed Order' submitted by Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel. The defense sought to modify Epstein's community control conditions to remove 'mandatory public service' (claiming it was a clerical error) and to authorize business travel outside Florida. The State Attorney explicitly rejected the agreement and requested an evidentiary hearing.
061.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Appendix filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. in a Florida state court case involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains a transcript of a June 2009 hearing regarding the unsealing of court records, administrative orders, case law, and federal court filings including a declaration by AUSA A. Marie Villafana regarding the federal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The appendix documents the legal arguments surrounding the transparency of the Epstein proceedings and the government's interaction with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
060.pdf
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
055.pdf
This document is a transcript of court proceedings from June 26, 2009, regarding State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The hearing concerns a 'Motion to Stay' filed by Epstein's defense to prevent the immediate release of sealed documents, specifically a Non-Prosecution Agreement (MPA) and grand jury materials, pending an appeal. The Judge denies the indefinite stay and the request for a bond but grants a short delay until the following Thursday to allow the defense time to file with the appellate court. The document also touches on potential redactions of children's names, which the Judge notes were not actually found in the documents in question.
034.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 3, 2009, by a redacted nonparty (a victim of Jeffrey Epstein) seeking to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum in the Florida state criminal case. The motion argues the sealing violated Florida judicial rules and public policy, and that the documents are material to the victim's pending civil suit. Exhibits include judgments of conviction against Epstein for solicitation and procuring a minor, sealing orders from 2008, and transcripts from the June 30, 2008 plea conference where the existence of the federal NPA was discussed in open court.
017-11.pdf
This Omnibus Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida), dated April 1, 2010, denies two motions filed by Jeffrey Epstein for reconsideration of previous orders. The court upholds previous rulings compelling Epstein to produce specific discovery materials, including his passport and tax returns (W-2s and 1099s for 2003-2008), rejecting his Fifth Amendment arguments under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine and 'required records' exception. The order grants Epstein a ten-day window to file a formal appeal.
016-01.pdf
This document is a transcript of a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein held in June 2008 in Palm Beach County Court. Epstein pleads guilty to state charges involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor, agreeing to an 18-month jail sentence followed by community control (probation). The transcript details the specific conditions of his release, including residency at his Palm Beach home, work release at his own 'Florida Science Foundation' (located in the same building as his attorney), and strict prohibitions on contacting victims or minors.
015.pdf
This document is a Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Quash Service of Process. The plaintiff, M.J., argues that service was properly effected on October 8, 2010, when a private investigator handed the papers to an employee named 'Mark' at Epstein's New York mansion. The filing accuses Epstein and his associate Richard Barnett of fraud and perjury for submitting an affidavit claiming service never occurred, and details a pattern of obstruction by Epstein and his associates (including Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel) in similar civil cases.
022.pdf
A Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, in the case of L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-81092). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case on July 20, 2010, following a stipulation by the parties, while noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.
021-01.pdf
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, dated July 20, 2010. Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the civil case (09-CIV-81092) brought by plaintiff L.M. against Jeffrey Epstein following a settlement agreement between the parties. The court retained jurisdiction specifically to enforce the terms of said settlement.
020.pdf
This document is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on June 16, 2010, in the case of L.M. v. Epstein. Epstein's lawyers argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiff failed to serve the complaint within the required 120 days (Rule 4(m)). Furthermore, the motion alleges that the complaint filed by L.M. (represented by Bradley Edwards) was used as a prop in Scott Rothstein's massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme to lure investors with fabricated settlement agreements. The document cites depositions where L.M. contradicts allegations made in her complaint regarding sexual acts and travel.
020-01.pdf
This document contains a series of court orders and motions from the case *Morse v. Jan Jones International, Inc.* (Case 9:09-cv-81092-KAM) in the Southern District of Florida. The Plaintiffs, represented by Scott Rothstein, successfully argued that Jan Jones committed fraud and illegally moved funds to the Cayman Islands, resulting in an order for over $23 million in damages and the seizure of assets. The document includes a Stipulated Confidentiality Order and a subsequent Order on Emergency Writ of Mandamus from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which reinstated the District Court's orders and mandated review by the Department of Treasury and FBI due to the sensitive nature of the government's investigation.
023.pdf
This document is a formal notice filed on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. It informs the court and opposing counsel (specifically Bradley J. Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola) that 'Exhibit B' related to a subpoena status notice has been filed under seal. The underlying case referenced is Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
022.pdf
This document is a motion filed on December 16, 2016, by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file 'Exhibit B' under seal, noting that the exhibit is a sealed order from the Southern District of New York in the underlying 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case. The document lists legal counsel for Maxwell and for Bradley J. Edwards, who is the subject of a subpoena in this miscellaneous action.
015.pdf
This document is a Motion to Seal filed on July 7, 2016, by attorney Jack Scarola on behalf of Bradley J. Edwards in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Edwards seeks to seal exhibits attached to his Motion to Quash a subpoena, specifically referencing confidential depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell and Rinaldo Rizzo, as well as documents related to Alan Dershowitz, which are already under seal in the Southern District of New York. The motion argues that sealing is necessary to comply with protective orders from the underlying case.
013.pdf
This document is a reply filed by Bradley J. Edwards in support of his motion to quash a subpoena served on him by Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Edwards argues that the subpoena imposes an undue burden on him as a non-party and opposing counsel, seeking information that is already in Maxwell's possession, privileged, irrelevant, or available from other sources. The brief details the history of related litigation, including the CVRA case and a defamation suit against Alan Dershowitz, to support the argument that the subpoena is harassing and unnecessary.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity