This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues that a bequest in a will mentioned by the court is 'unactualized' and Maxwell has received nothing. The Court acknowledges this but concludes Maxwell has 'additional assets' sufficient to pay the fine and proceeds to formally impose the sentence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the sentencing hearing; discussed regarding her ability to pay a fine and an unactualized bequest.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ms. Maxwell; argues that Maxwell has received nothing from a bequest and requests recommendations.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (likely Prosecution) |
Briefly speaks at the beginning of the page.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing; determines Maxwell has assets to pay the fine and imposes the sentence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR footer).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Implied court jurisdiction.
|
"I just want the record to reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will receive nothing."Source
"there are additional assets that lead me to the conclusion that she is able to pay the fine."Source
"The sentence as stated is imposed."Source
"Ms. Maxwell, when you are released and on supervised release, you will have the guidance and support of the"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,418 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document