HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355.jpg

1.54 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / court document
File Size: 1.54 MB
Summary

This document outlines facts regarding Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme at the law firm RRA. It specifically addresses allegations that Rothstein used cases against Jeffrey Epstein—handled by attorney Bradley J. Edwards—to lure investors. The text defends Edwards, stating he worked at RRA for less than a year, had no knowledge of the fraud, and never substantively discussed the Epstein cases with Rothstein.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Scott Rothstein Attorney / Fraudster
Ran a Ponzi scheme at RRA; allegedly used Epstein cases to lure investors.
Bradley J. Edwards Attorney
Handled cases against Epstein; worked at RRA briefly; denies knowledge of Rothstein's use of Epstein cases for fraud.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of lawsuits handled by Edwards; cases were used by Rothstein to lure investors.
Scott W. Rothstein Defendant
Named in case citation United States v. Scott W. Rothstein.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. (RRA)
Law firm where the Ponzi scheme took place.
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Court handling the Rothstein case (S.D. Fla.).

Timeline (4 events)

2005 - November 2009
Scott Rothstein ran a giant Ponzi scheme at RRA.
Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A.
April 2009
Bradley J. Edwards joined RRA.
RRA
January 27, 2010
Plea Agreement in United States v. Scott W. Rothstein.
S.D. Fla.
November 2009
Bradley J. Edwards left RRA upon learning of the fraud.
RRA

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the Rothstein case.

Relationships (3)

Scott Rothstein Colleagues Bradley J. Edwards
Edwards worked at Rothstein's firm (RRA) from April 2009 to November 2009.
Bradley J. Edwards Adversarial / Legal Jeffrey Epstein
Edwards was prosecuting 'legitimate claims' against Epstein.
Scott Rothstein Exploitative (Indirect) Jeffrey Epstein
Rothstein used the existence of cases against Epstein to lure investors into a Ponzi scheme.

Key Quotes (3)

"It has been alleged that among other cases that Rothstein used to lure investors into his Ponzi scheme were the cases against Epstein that were being handled by Bradley J. Edwards, Esq."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355.jpg
Quote #1
"Edwards had no knowledge of the fraud or any such use of the Epstein cases."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355.jpg
Quote #2
"Edwards never substantively discussed the merits of any of his three cases against Epstein with Rothstein."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,814 characters)

86. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. ("RRA"). This Ponzi scheme involved Rothstein falsely informing investors that settlement agreements had been reached with putative defendants based upon claims of sexual harassment and/or whistle-blower actions. Rothstein falsely informed the investors that the potential settlement agreements were available for purchase. Plea Agreement at 2, United States v. Scott W. Rothstein, No. 9-60331-CR-COHN (S.D. Fla. Jan. 27, 2010) attached hereto as Exhibit "SS."
87. It has been alleged that among other cases that Rothstein used to lure investors into his Ponzi scheme were the cases against Epstein that were being handled by Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Edwards had no knowledge of the fraud or any such use of the Epstein cases. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at ¶9.
88. Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., joined RRA in about April 2009 and left RRA in November 2009 – a period of less than one year. Edwards would not have joined RRA had he been aware that Scott Rothstein was running a giant Ponzi scheme at the firm. Edwards left RRA shortly after learning of Rothstein’s fraudulent scheme. Id. at ¶8.
89. At no time prior to the public disclosure of Rothstein’s Ponzi scheme did Edwards know or have reason to believe that Rothstein was using legitimate claims that Edwards was prosecuting against Epstein for any fraudulent or otherwise illegitimate purpose. Id. at ¶20.
90. Edwards never substantively discussed the merits of any of his three cases against Epstein with Rothstein. See Deposition of Bradley J. Edwards taken March 23, 2010, at 110-16. (hereinafter "Edwards Depo") (Deposition Attachment #22).
37
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013355

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document