DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
628 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae)
File Size:
628 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text details arguments regarding the 'enticement statute,' utilizing testimony from a victim identified as 'Jane' and an expert, Dr. Rocchio, to establish that the defendant exercised 'coercive control' and personally engaged in sexual abuse. It further argues an 'aiding and abetting' theory, stating the defendant knowingly facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of Jane by being present on the plane and in the room in New York.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) | Defendant |
Accused of coercive control, sexual abuse, and aiding/abetting Jeffrey Epstein. Described as being 'on the plane and ...
|
| Jane | Victim/Witness |
Subject of coercive control and sexual abuse; testified regarding the defendant's conduct and travel to New York.
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Expert Witness |
Provided testimony regarding coercive control relationships.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Co-conspirator |
Described as the one who enticed, persuaded, induced, and coerced Jane to travel to New York.
|
| The Court / Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker regarding legal standards and conclusions.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Jane was coerced to travel and where sexual abuse occurred.
|
Relationships (2)
Relationship of coercive control; defendant engaged in sexual abuse of Jane.
Defendant aided and abetted Epstein; facilitated abuse; traveled on plane together.
Key Quotes (4)
"the defendant personally engaged in sexual abuse of Jane."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
Quote #1
"Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce, and coerce Jane to travel to New York."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
Quote #2
"she was on the plane and in the room in New York when the abuse was happening."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
Quote #3
"the defendant was in a relationship of coercive control with Jane"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013835.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,610 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 244 of 267 2272
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 with her, talked about sex with her, bought her gifts, took her
2 on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in
3 combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury
4 to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of
5 coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to
6 exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York
7 where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in
8 sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the
9 enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the
10 course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many
11 years.
12 But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that
13 that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an
14 aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious
15 argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce,
16 and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact,
17 it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan,
18 given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York
19 when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple
20 years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate
21 it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute
22 is met.
23 And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as
24 I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is
25 remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all
2 on field trips. The defendant -- Jane's testimony, in
3 combination with Dr. Rocchio's testimony, would lead the jury
4 to concludes that the defendant was in a relationship of
5 coercive control with Jane, which would have allowed her to
6 exercise control to get Jane to continue to travel to New York
7 where, Jane's testimony is, the defendant personally engaged in
8 sexual abuse of Jane. So those are plenty of reasons why the
9 enticement statute is met as to Jane herself, in light of the
10 course of conduct the defendant engaged in with Jane over many
11 years.
12 But even if the Court didn't readily conclude that
13 that statute was met, the defendant is also charged under an
14 aiding and abetting theory. And there can be no serious
15 argument that Jeffrey Epstein didn't entice, persuade, induce,
16 and coerce Jane to travel to New York. And given that fact,
17 it's quite obvious that the defendant was aware of that plan,
18 given that she was on the plane and in the room in New York
19 when the abuse was happening. And she took steps over multiple
20 years to knowingly associate herself with it and to facilitate
21 it. So that, again, is a separate theory by which the statute
22 is met.
23 And finally, here, I would just remind your Honor, as
24 I'm sure your Honor is already aware, the standard here is
25 remarkably low. All that is required is that taking all
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013835
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document